Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Cross Base Highway: Alive and Kicking

3859550725_e1cf33ec58

Environmental groups like the Transportation Choices Coalition were under the impression that the death of the 2007 “roads and transit” ballot measure also doomed the Cross Base Highway in Pierce County—a four-to-six-lane highway that would cut through Fort Lewis and the McChord Air Force Base in Pierce County and connect to I-5.

Not so fast. Last week, state officials broke ground on what is being called the first segment of the highway, which is not fully funded. Cross Base was one of the most controversial elements of the unsuccessful roads and transit measure, because it would destroy wildlife habitat and stimulate sprawl in rural and exurban Pierce County,  environmental groups like the Transportation Choices Coalition and the Tahoma Audubon Society say.

At a ribbon-cutting ceremony in Spanaway this past Saturday, Pierce County state Rep. Tom Campbell (R-2) pointed through the trees and declared, “I can see I-5 from here.” I-5 is about six miles away from the initial segment, through the last remaining oak-woodland prairis in Western Washingotn.

Although groups like TCC insist that the failure of roads and transit was supposed to also doom Cross Base, along with the rest of the 182 miles of new highways in the proposal, supporters seem optimistic that they’ll secure funding for the rest of the $400-million-plus project.

“The good news is that we’ve got the right-of-way secured, we’ve got all the lawsuits settled, now we just need to secure funding,” Campbell says. ” They said we would never build this first segment. I’ve got a good track record of winning these fights, and I’m going to win this one and we’re going to build it.”

Project engineer John Ho sounds less optimistic about the highway’s prospects, noting that “there is currently no construction funding for the project, so we are not working on it.

“This project is currently on hold.”

But Campbell says he’ll push in the upcoming legislative session to secure funding, despite a state budget shortfall that, last year, amounted to about $9 billion. As TCC director Rob Johnson puts it, “Why would you build the Cross Base Highway when there are so many other projects that aren’t controversial that need funding? … Our job is to convince [legislators] that there are a lot of other projects they should be funding.”

Campbell counters that Pierce County hasn’t been getting its fair share. “Here in Pierce County, that road is so important for congestion relief and the military base as well. It’s a critical need,” Campbell says. “Pierce County has raised its head on transportation issues and it’s going to stay up. We’re not going to lay down on the ground and let the money go out the door like we have in the past. We’re going to start getting our money out here to build the infrastructure that we need.”

Campbell says state Sen. Mary Margaret Haugen (D-10), head of the Senate transportation committee, “has a bee in her bonnet” about completing the project. Haugen was in Okanagan County with no cell reception today and could not be reached for comment.

Campbell also said he was in discussions with Pierce County Executive Pat McCarthy—a supporter of the proposal—as well as Congressman Adam Smith (D-9, second from left above) to talk about other funding sources. Smith spokesman Michael Amato says Smith definitely supports the project, and says the Congressman may seek federal funding through in this year’s transportation appropriations bill. McCarthy has not yet returned a call for comment.

Cross Base supporters could potentially face another lawsuit by environmentalists, who unsuccessfully sued to stop the highway in 2006. Campbell says he isn’t worried. “Once you lose a lawsuit, you can get rid of [further lawsuits] pretty fast. We’ve made reasonable accomodations. It’s not like it’s been some arrogant get-out-the-bulldozer type of thing. I think a judge will see that in court.”


  • Emerald

    Sprawl is exactly what Campbell wants, although he calls it “infrastructure.” Nice photo-op stunt.

    Haugen will hopefully keep stomping this out.

    State Senator Haugen, chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, acknowledged that her committee re-distributed the House’s CBH funding elsewhere.

    “The Cross-Base Highway is not a priority for the Senate,” Haugen told the Dispatch .

    Senator Haugen also declared that her committee does not see the Cross Base Highway as a priority for anyone.

    “Everyone in the Pierce County Coalition says the Cross-Base Highway is important, but no one says it’s their top priority,” Haugen said.Ê “We simply do not have the money to build anything that is not a priority.”

    http://www.dispatchnews.com/main.asp?SectionID=6&SubSectionID=6&ArticleID=2152&TM=84.472

  • Emerald

    Sprawl is exactly what Campbell wants, although he calls it “infrastructure.” Nice photo-op stunt.

    Haugen will hopefully keep stomping this out.

    State Senator Haugen, chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, acknowledged that her committee re-distributed the House’s CBH funding elsewhere.

    “The Cross-Base Highway is not a priority for the Senate,” Haugen told the Dispatch .

    Senator Haugen also declared that her committee does not see the Cross Base Highway as a priority for anyone.

    “Everyone in the Pierce County Coalition says the Cross-Base Highway is important, but no one says it’s their top priority,” Haugen said.Ê “We simply do not have the money to build anything that is not a priority.”

    http://www.dispatchnews.com/main.asp?SectionID=6&SubSectionID=6&ArticleID=2152&TM=84.472

  • Andrew Austin

    I posted our whole press release following the event on our blog as well the link to pictures. http://transportationchoicescoalition.blogspot.com/2009/09/cross-base-controversy-continues.html

  • Andrew Austin

    I posted our whole press release following the event on our blog as well the link to pictures. http://transportationchoicescoalition.blogspot.com/2009/09/cross-base-controversy-continues.html

  • Mikos

    The reason this project is going to happen is that it makes perfect sense. It doesn’t increase sprawl, but connects the sprawl to I-5 so people can actually get some place on a highway that is built ot move them. Even if you only want the Cross Base Highway to be used by express buses, you still have to build it. It’s easy to sit in Seattle and ask folks to take buses, trollies or light rail. those options don’t exist to people who have had to move to suburban Pierce county because that’s where they can afford decent housing. The anti-Cross Base Highway argument strikes me as destructive to environmentalism.

  • Mikos

    The reason this project is going to happen is that it makes perfect sense. It doesn’t increase sprawl, but connects the sprawl to I-5 so people can actually get some place on a highway that is built ot move them. Even if you only want the Cross Base Highway to be used by express buses, you still have to build it. It’s easy to sit in Seattle and ask folks to take buses, trollies or light rail. those options don’t exist to people who have had to move to suburban Pierce county because that’s where they can afford decent housing. The anti-Cross Base Highway argument strikes me as destructive to environmentalism.

  • yessir

    Yes, and with all that “urbanism” crap going down (re: high rent, high price) plenty more will be moving out to the burbs. ECB might propose we dig a moat around Seattle to keep us out. The we can argue for 8 more year on what kind of bridge to build over it.

  • ivan

    The Cross-Base Highway will create another, much-needed connector route between the industrial area and distribution center roughly known as Frederickson, due south of Puyallup, and the Port of Tacoma.

    This connection is now served by State Highways 512 and 167. They are maxed out, which anyone who has driven on them — almost certainly not ECB — knows.

    Cross-Base primarily would be moving goods and not people. Frederickson is the largest contiguous area in Western Washington that is zoned industrial. The “sprawl” is already there, because the family-wage union jobs are there. In other words, people have moved close to where their jobs are. Ironic, neh?

    Cross-Base makes sense because it means at least 50,000 jobs to the Port of Tacoma right from ths jump, and far more over the long run for Pierce County.

    ECB can’t stop it, Transportation Choices can’t stop it, Mary Margaret Haugen can’t stop it, and enviros can’t stop it. They can wave their arms around in the air a lot; it creates a nice breeze.

    If the counties can’t fund it, the Legislature will. If the legislature can’t fund it, the Feds will.

    It will be built, and so will every other highway that was in the 2007 RTID. They will be built because people need them.

  • ivan

    The Cross-Base Highway will create another, much-needed connector route between the industrial area and distribution center roughly known as Frederickson, due south of Puyallup, and the Port of Tacoma.

    This connection is now served by State Highways 512 and 167. They are maxed out, which anyone who has driven on them — almost certainly not ECB — knows.

    Cross-Base primarily would be moving goods and not people. Frederickson is the largest contiguous area in Western Washington that is zoned industrial. The “sprawl” is already there, because the family-wage union jobs are there. In other words, people have moved close to where their jobs are. Ironic, neh?

    Cross-Base makes sense because it means at least 50,000 jobs to the Port of Tacoma right from ths jump, and far more over the long run for Pierce County.

    ECB can’t stop it, Transportation Choices can’t stop it, Mary Margaret Haugen can’t stop it, and enviros can’t stop it. They can wave their arms around in the air a lot; it creates a nice breeze.

    If the counties can’t fund it, the Legislature will. If the legislature can’t fund it, the Feds will.

    It will be built, and so will every other highway that was in the 2007 RTID. They will be built because people need them.

  • Emerald

    Yes, Ivan, Boeing’s desires always take prominence over the voters’ interests.

  • Emerald

    Yes, Ivan, Boeing’s desires always take prominence over the voters’ interests.

  • Sleepless in Spanaway

    @5 “It will be built, and so will every other highway that was in the 2007 RTID. They will be built because people need them.”

    Ivan, unfortunately you are correct. Let ECB take a look at the roads that were proposed in Roads & Transit and compare that to roads built or under construction.

    Now look at the transit proposed and the transit built or under construction…

    Idiots like McGinn and O’Brien like to take all the credit for stopping the roads, but the truth is that they didn’t stop the initiative (the high cost did) and they didn’t stop the roads (all will eventually be built).

    What they were successful in doing is halting a light rail connection between Tacoma, the state’s third largest city (only a few thousand smaller than Spokane), and a major airport.

    Has anyone asked McGinn if he supports light rail to Pierce or Snohomish County? Or regional planning in any way?

  • Sleepless in Spanaway

    @5 “It will be built, and so will every other highway that was in the 2007 RTID. They will be built because people need them.”

    Ivan, unfortunately you are correct. Let ECB take a look at the roads that were proposed in Roads & Transit and compare that to roads built or under construction.

    Now look at the transit proposed and the transit built or under construction…

    Idiots like McGinn and O’Brien like to take all the credit for stopping the roads, but the truth is that they didn’t stop the initiative (the high cost did) and they didn’t stop the roads (all will eventually be built).

    What they were successful in doing is halting a light rail connection between Tacoma, the state’s third largest city (only a few thousand smaller than Spokane), and a major airport.

    Has anyone asked McGinn if he supports light rail to Pierce or Snohomish County? Or regional planning in any way?

  • ivan

    @ 7:

    We can agree or disagree about whether or not is is “fortunate” or “unfortunate” about the roads, but I agree with you 100 percent about the light rail from Tacoma through Federal Way to the airport.

    If McGinn is elected mayor, the biggest beneficiary of his single term will be Greg Nickels’ reputation.

  • ivan

    @ 7:

    We can agree or disagree about whether or not is is “fortunate” or “unfortunate” about the roads, but I agree with you 100 percent about the light rail from Tacoma through Federal Way to the airport.

    If McGinn is elected mayor, the biggest beneficiary of his single term will be Greg Nickels’ reputation.

  • aff

    I hope this alleviates congestion in the Ft. Lewis base area near I-5. Think exits 120-110. It is a traffic vortex, which requires far to much screaming and 92.5 for me to get through. Having stop-and-go traffic in the sticks isn’t good for the environment either.

  • aff

    I hope this alleviates congestion in the Ft. Lewis base area near I-5. Think exits 120-110. It is a traffic vortex, which requires far to much screaming and 92.5 for me to get through. Having stop-and-go traffic in the sticks isn’t good for the environment either.

  • belk

    @7: Excellent point — it’s turning out that the roads in the roads and transit initiative are all getting built anyway, but the light rail that was approved is scaled down and won’t connect Tacoma to the airport or Federal Way. Bad for Tacoma, bad for the environment. All so that the Sierra Club could make a “statement” in 2007.

  • belk

    @7: Excellent point — it’s turning out that the roads in the roads and transit initiative are all getting built anyway, but the light rail that was approved is scaled down and won’t connect Tacoma to the airport or Federal Way. Bad for Tacoma, bad for the environment. All so that the Sierra Club could make a “statement” in 2007.

  • TimG

    The cross-base hwy will do nothing to alleviate the major transportation deficiency in that section of Pierce County, but instead promote more sprawl all the way out to Orting (yes, many interests want to expand the 176th St. corridor from Frederickson to Orting). The industrial area is well served by Canyon Rd, widened and repaved recently. Road money would be better spent on an arterial street connection between McChord and Ft. Lewis paralleling I-5 so the local traffic need not jump on I-5 to travel three or four exits.
    More light rail in Tacoma, such as south from downtown along the Pacific Ave corridor or west to UPS and the community college, will be far more cost effective for several decades than building a line through relatively sparse areas south of Federal Way.

  • TimG

    The cross-base hwy will do nothing to alleviate the major transportation deficiency in that section of Pierce County, but instead promote more sprawl all the way out to Orting (yes, many interests want to expand the 176th St. corridor from Frederickson to Orting). The industrial area is well served by Canyon Rd, widened and repaved recently. Road money would be better spent on an arterial street connection between McChord and Ft. Lewis paralleling I-5 so the local traffic need not jump on I-5 to travel three or four exits.
    More light rail in Tacoma, such as south from downtown along the Pacific Ave corridor or west to UPS and the community college, will be far more cost effective for several decades than building a line through relatively sparse areas south of Federal Way.

  • ivan

    The industrial area is well served by Canyon Rd, widened and repaved recently.

    Rubbish. Canyon Rd. doesn’t connect to I-5, except via the already bottlenecked 512.

  • ivan

    The industrial area is well served by Canyon Rd, widened and repaved recently.

    Rubbish. Canyon Rd. doesn’t connect to I-5, except via the already bottlenecked 512.

  • stop traffic

    The Frederickson business center is essentially full, and employs less than 3500 people. The political driver for this road is developer dollars from Cascadia, the massive master planned community that Patrick Kuo is building far, far from any mass transit or major highways. You can pretty much draw a straight line from I-5, through Ft. Lewis, along 176th, and then another “new” road called the 176th St. East Extension which will end at the Calistoga bridge in Orting, where guess what, Cascadia will be built high on a ridge (even further from any major road) with Mt. Rainer views. Think if that developer had put his hundreds of millions of dollars in developing some of the blighted areas of downtown Tacoma, many which also have views!

  • stop traffic

    The Frederickson business center is essentially full, and employs less than 3500 people. The political driver for this road is developer dollars from Cascadia, the massive master planned community that Patrick Kuo is building far, far from any mass transit or major highways. You can pretty much draw a straight line from I-5, through Ft. Lewis, along 176th, and then another “new” road called the 176th St. East Extension which will end at the Calistoga bridge in Orting, where guess what, Cascadia will be built high on a ridge (even further from any major road) with Mt. Rainer views. Think if that developer had put his hundreds of millions of dollars in developing some of the blighted areas of downtown Tacoma, many which also have views!

  • ivan

    @ 13:

    The Frederickson business center is just a small piece of the total contiguous land already zoned for manufacturing and distribution in that immediate area, and there is plenty of room for industrial expansion, so your statement is just plain false.

    Anybody who reads this Puget Sound Regional Council grant application, online at:

    http://www.psrc.org/boards/cpsedd/pwp/fy09/2008_pierce_county.pdf

    will understand what I’m talking about. Even the widening of Canyon Rd., which this grant proposal is specific to, would not be enough to handle the anticipated traffic. The bottlenecks at the Canyon Rd.-SR 512 junction are well known to anyone who is forced to negotiate them. The stretch of 512 that connects Canyon Rd. to I-5 is maxed out already.

    Industry needs Cross-Base. The development in Orting sucks, I agree with that, but industry needs Cross-Base with or without that development.

    Besides, when Mt. Rainier blows, Orting and everything around it is going to go.

  • ivan

    @ 13:

    The Frederickson business center is just a small piece of the total contiguous land already zoned for manufacturing and distribution in that immediate area, and there is plenty of room for industrial expansion, so your statement is just plain false.

    Anybody who reads this Puget Sound Regional Council grant application, online at:

    http://www.psrc.org/boards/cpsedd/pwp/fy09/2008_pierce_county.pdf

    will understand what I’m talking about. Even the widening of Canyon Rd., which this grant proposal is specific to, would not be enough to handle the anticipated traffic. The bottlenecks at the Canyon Rd.-SR 512 junction are well known to anyone who is forced to negotiate them. The stretch of 512 that connects Canyon Rd. to I-5 is maxed out already.

    Industry needs Cross-Base. The development in Orting sucks, I agree with that, but industry needs Cross-Base with or without that development.

    Besides, when Mt. Rainier blows, Orting and everything around it is going to go.

  • notme

    Ivan is full of it. CBH is an expensive diversion from far more important highways. Any dime spent on CBH before 167 is completed to the Port of Tacoma is a waste. Any dime spent on CBH rather than the far cheaper and environmentally better solution of adding lanes to the existing 512 is a waste. CBH is a developers wetdream.

  • notme

    Ivan is full of it. CBH is an expensive diversion from far more important highways. Any dime spent on CBH before 167 is completed to the Port of Tacoma is a waste. Any dime spent on CBH rather than the far cheaper and environmentally better solution of adding lanes to the existing 512 is a waste. CBH is a developers wetdream.

  • ivan

    @ 15:

    Hey, wait a minute there, bub! I’d be totally in favor of adding lanes to 512.

  • ivan

    @ 15:

    Hey, wait a minute there, bub! I’d be totally in favor of adding lanes to 512.

  • yessir

    Yes, and with all that “urbanism” crap going down (re: high rent, high price) plenty more will be moving out to the burbs. ECB might propose we dig a moat around Seattle to keep us out. The we can argue for 8 more year on what kind of bridge to build over it.