Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Seattle's Only Day Center for Women and Children May Close

Seattle’s only day center for women and children, Mary’s Place, may have to close its doors. The reasons include an apparent snafu by a city employee; an ugly impasse with its previous landlord; and the fact that its current landlord, Denny Park Lutheran Church, may sell the building where it is located.

The loss of Mary’s Place would leave Seattle without an emergency day shelter housing women and children. Most shelters and day centers (even those, like the YWCA’s downtown Angeline’s Day Center, that are aimed at homeless women) will not accept women with children because of liability issues; additionally, men are not allowed at shelters that accept homeless women with children.

For 14 years, Mary’s Place—run by the Church of Mary Magdalene—was housed in the downtown Seattle First United Methodist Church. In 2007, however, the church sold the sanctuary to developer Nitze-Stagen because it couldn’t afford to fix up the landmark building, which was also too big for its shrinking congregation. As part of the deal, Nitze-Stagen agreed to restore the building (it’s currently being used as a concert hall) and the city and King County each pledged to give the church $500,000 to provide services to the homeless.

Mary’s Place (as well as many at the city) assumed that that funding for "services to the homeless" would pay for a new shelter for the organization, board member JJ McKay says. According to both sides, the church was open to that possibility—as long as the group agreed to give up its independent 501(c)3 status and become a program of the church, something Mary’s Place was not willing to do. So, in March, McKay says, "We were told that we were not invited back, period." Instead, First United Methodist would use the money to pay for its own, 24-hour shelter and day center—this one open only to men.

In response to the church’s decision, Mary’s Place has begun asking the city and county to give Mary’s Place half the money the two governments pledged to First United Methodist. "The best-case scenario is that the city [or county] would come up with some money for us… to buy a new facility," McKay says. County council president Dow Constantine’s office says it’s unlikely that the county can come up with much of the money in its current budget crisis, and certainly not on a fast track basis; the city, similarly, is facing a budget shortfall of $72 million this year and next.

First United Methodist Church pastor Sandy Brown, a longtime advocate for the homeless, says the church wanted to run its own program as part of its mission "to be involved in the care of the community." He says the church didn’t want to have "a comfortable suburban church upstairs and a gritty homeless street ministry downstairs, and the two never interact. I wanted it to become all one ministry where people who are in fancy hats and fur coats sitting are next to people who are homeless."

The reasons the church wanted to host a shelter for men, Brown says, were twofold: First,  80 percent of the people who are homeless are men; and second, splitting the shelter into a day center for women and a night shelter for men, as they would have if the church had taken Mary’s Place over, is less than ideal. "We’re not helping them when we provide space for 12 hours and they’re homeless half the day."

Ironically, the downturn in the economy means that First United Methodist may not secure the $300,000 it needs from the city annually to operate its shelter, and so they could potentially house the Mary’s Place program now—if their relationship hadn’t turned so ugly that, according to Brown, McKay and others associated with Mary’s Place won’t return his calls. "It’s conceivable that we’ll have space available for a program starting in January of 2010, but what’s also kind of sad is that our relationship with the Church of Mary Magdalene has really soured over the last few months. We are very sad that they have not answered our request to meet with us or to meet with a mediator."

He adds, "We were surprised and shocked and hurt that our partner of 14 years would go after our funding like that. It’s just been a very painful relationship as they attempted to get our money from the city and the county."

Mary’s Place moved to Denny Park Lutheran, a couple of miles away on Dexter Avenue, a few months ago. However, the building they’re currently using is on the market, and McKay says it’s only a matter of time before the shelter will have to move.

McKay says he made that clear to the city: "We told [city human services manager Marilyn Littlejohn] that they’re trying to sell the building and we have a month-to-month lease [that's renewable] for two years. If they don’t sell the building, we have a lease. If they do, we have to get out."

However, in a letter to city council members, Littlejohn said the shelter had secured a location "for the next couple of years. Denny Park Lutheran Church voted last Tuesday to offer Mary’s Place a two year lease extension, which will be reviewed at the end of one year. …  This agreement will allow Mary’s Place more time to continue its search for a larger space for its programs and services."

"We know they’re in active talks to sell the building, we told her that, and she told the council something very different," McKay says.

Although McKay believes Littlejohn (a First United Methodist congregant) intentionally misrepresented the shelter’s situation, city insiders say the error seems to be an example of wishful thinking, not intentional harm. (Littlejohn was out of the office last week and has not returned a message). At any rate, council members were relieved at the "good news," and unwittingly stopped serving as a go-between with the shelter and the church for several days—time that could have been spent trying to hammer out a compromise.

Complicating matters further, McKay says the  shelter has been asked to leave by December, but Denny Park Lutheran Church pastor Douglas Lindsay says that isn’t true. "We’re studying different possibilities for it, but we haven’t sold it," Lindsay says. "That’s pretty far in the future." He notes that the shelter’s current site isn’t ideal—it’s small and requires the shelter to share space with several other groups—but adds, "we’re really happy that the space is getting used and helping people."

Despite all that, McKay sent out a letter last Wednesday saying the day center plans to close on February 26, 2010—at which point, he says, his church will start referring women to shelters elsewhere in the region or directing them to inexpensive hotels. "We have decided that with Denny Park in good faith talks [to sell its building] and [there] being little hope of funding before January, we have been given no choice."


  • Joshua Daniel Franklin

    I am so angry.

    By the way, First UMC’s new location is by Seattle Center, pretty close to Denny Park Lutheran.

    Some facts from the Solid Ground housing at Sand Point page:

    9 years old is the average age of a homeless person nationally.
    8,439 people are homeless in King County (according to last year’s One Night Count).
    5,808 of the homeless are in shelters and transitional programs – and 50% of people living in shelters are children ages 0-17.
    This year, foreclosures in King County are up 84% over this time last year.

  • Joshua Daniel Franklin

    I am so angry.

    By the way, First UMC’s new location is by Seattle Center, pretty close to Denny Park Lutheran.

    Some facts from the Solid Ground housing at Sand Point page:

    9 years old is the average age of a homeless person nationally.
    8,439 people are homeless in King County (according to last year’s One Night Count).
    5,808 of the homeless are in shelters and transitional programs – and 50% of people living in shelters are children ages 0-17.
    This year, foreclosures in King County are up 84% over this time last year.

  • revsandybrown

    Thanks for your comprehensive article, Erica. In spite of the prickliness of this controversy, First United Methodist continues to hold open our offer of assistance to the Church of Mary Magdalene in its search for a new home. We hope for reconciliation with the CoMM board so that we can once again be trusted colleagues in ministry to Seattle’s homeless.

  • revsandybrown

    Thanks for your comprehensive article, Erica. In spite of the prickliness of this controversy, First United Methodist continues to hold open our offer of assistance to the Church of Mary Magdalene in its search for a new home. We hope for reconciliation with the CoMM board so that we can once again be trusted colleagues in ministry to Seattle’s homeless.

  • Joshua Daniel Franklin

    Another idea for publicola: how about asking the city council and mayoral candidates if they’d make a pro bono plea for money for the homeless in addition to the money for their own campaigns.

    Maybe they’d even pledge to donate any remainder after the election, if that’s legal.

  • Joshua Daniel Franklin

    Another idea for publicola: how about asking the city council and mayoral candidates if they’d make a pro bono plea for money for the homeless in addition to the money for their own campaigns.

    Maybe they’d even pledge to donate any remainder after the election, if that’s legal.

  • non

    “snafu” stands for “Situation Normal, All Fucked Up”. Here is is used to mean the opposite of its meaning, that a city employee’s mistake is an anomoly or a single instance. Why is such poor writing so rewarded in these parts?

  • non

    “snafu” stands for “Situation Normal, All Fucked Up”. Here is is used to mean the opposite of its meaning, that a city employee’s mistake is an anomoly or a single instance. Why is such poor writing so rewarded in these parts?

  • chicagoexpat

    whhdya expect? Seattle-ites have far more important things to do, like
    the fundraisers to Help Dog Owners Who Can’t Afford Personal Pet Masseuses, or the
    Take Back the Streets bike rides across W. Seattle Bridge (part of the Sierra Club & Mayor-to-be-McGinn’s plans to make the bridge “pedestrian only” and outlaw the devils wagon in all of Seattle)

  • chicagoexpat

    whhdya expect? Seattle-ites have far more important things to do, like
    the fundraisers to Help Dog Owners Who Can’t Afford Personal Pet Masseuses, or the
    Take Back the Streets bike rides across W. Seattle Bridge (part of the Sierra Club & Mayor-to-be-McGinn’s plans to make the bridge “pedestrian only” and outlaw the devils wagon in all of Seattle)

  • Charity

    Rev Brown: Does this “offer of assistance” have the same astonishing strings the last one did, i.e., that the group dissolve itself into a program of your church?

  • Charity

    Rev Brown: Does this “offer of assistance” have the same astonishing strings the last one did, i.e., that the group dissolve itself into a program of your church?

  • Sarah

    And would it be more palatable, Rev. Brown, for the members of your church dressed in furs, etc. to sit next to a homeless man instead of a homeless woman and her children? That’s the relationship you prefer?

    I realize that giving homeless women and children NO place to stay is much better, much more humane, than giving them a place to stay for 12 hours a day.

    Producing chop-logic like that and then pulling your cloak of religiousity around you is not at all admirable. You shouldn’t be “shocked” if you draw anger.

  • Sarah

    And would it be more palatable, Rev. Brown, for the members of your church dressed in furs, etc. to sit next to a homeless man instead of a homeless woman and her children? That’s the relationship you prefer?

    I realize that giving homeless women and children NO place to stay is much better, much more humane, than giving them a place to stay for 12 hours a day.

    Producing chop-logic like that and then pulling your cloak of religiousity around you is not at all admirable. You shouldn’t be “shocked” if you draw anger.

  • Susan Black

    I have read this article twice, and want to be sure I have it straight. First Church offered Mary’s Place a location for their program, which Mary’s Place refused, thinking apparently that in these poor economic times they would be better at fund raising all on their own, rather than partner with a bigger church and known advocate for the homeless. Denny Park Lutheran has given Mary’s Place a lease for up to 2 years, but Mary’s Place has decided to turn that down, too, and close in February–apparently because that church might decide sometime in the distant future to sell the building. JJ McKay says Denny Park Lutheran has asked them to move, but the church says this is not true. And although First Church has reached out, Mary’s Place won’t return their phone calls? So how is the situation facing Mary’s Place anyone’s fault but the leadership of Mary’s Place itself? Looks like JJ McKay is just trying put favorable “spin” on extremely poor decision-making by him and the other board members of Mary’s Place in not partnering with not one, but now TWO churches offering them help. What Mary’s Place needs besides new space is a new board of directors, and someone other than McKay doing their PR.

  • Susan Black

    I have read this article twice, and want to be sure I have it straight. First Church offered Mary’s Place a location for their program, which Mary’s Place refused, thinking apparently that in these poor economic times they would be better at fund raising all on their own, rather than partner with a bigger church and known advocate for the homeless. Denny Park Lutheran has given Mary’s Place a lease for up to 2 years, but Mary’s Place has decided to turn that down, too, and close in February–apparently because that church might decide sometime in the distant future to sell the building. JJ McKay says Denny Park Lutheran has asked them to move, but the church says this is not true. And although First Church has reached out, Mary’s Place won’t return their phone calls? So how is the situation facing Mary’s Place anyone’s fault but the leadership of Mary’s Place itself? Looks like JJ McKay is just trying put favorable “spin” on extremely poor decision-making by him and the other board members of Mary’s Place in not partnering with not one, but now TWO churches offering them help. What Mary’s Place needs besides new space is a new board of directors, and someone other than McKay doing their PR.

  • nwcitizen

    Once again poor people are being used as pawns in a power struggle between people who should know better. Shame!

    I can understand the City of Seattle behaving badly under the leadership of soon to be ex-Mayor Nickles but churches? They should know better.

    Hopefully cooler and kinder heads will prevail and an agreement reached to offer shelter to homeless women and children.

  • nwcitizen

    Once again poor people are being used as pawns in a power struggle between people who should know better. Shame!

    I can understand the City of Seattle behaving badly under the leadership of soon to be ex-Mayor Nickles but churches? They should know better.

    Hopefully cooler and kinder heads will prevail and an agreement reached to offer shelter to homeless women and children.

  • Sarah

    @8: No, I don’t think you have it straight. Read the article again.

    The Church MM does not have a lease for 2 years at its current location; it’s a month-to-month situation and when your landlord’s trying to sell your house, you naturally look for a new place. The City person either lied or didn’t understand the situation. First Church told Mary’s Place that they would house them only IF them were no longer a program on their own (which they have been for years). I.e., they would have to become part of First Church. When Mary’s Place said they’d rather not, First Church declared they would use the money for a men’s shelter — which means that none of Church of MM’s clients could have use of it.

    First Church has a very tenuous hold on its martyrs status in this situation.

  • Sarah

    @8: No, I don’t think you have it straight. Read the article again.

    The Church MM does not have a lease for 2 years at its current location; it’s a month-to-month situation and when your landlord’s trying to sell your house, you naturally look for a new place. The City person either lied or didn’t understand the situation. First Church told Mary’s Place that they would house them only IF them were no longer a program on their own (which they have been for years). I.e., they would have to become part of First Church. When Mary’s Place said they’d rather not, First Church declared they would use the money for a men’s shelter — which means that none of Church of MM’s clients could have use of it.

    First Church has a very tenuous hold on its martyrs status in this situation.

  • Susan B.

    It sounds like the first mistake was made when the city and county pledged money to First United, which housed this independent program, rather than to the program itself, which was simply being housed by the church. The church had no incentive or obligation to continue housing the program, beyond compassion and basic moral leadership. The simple fact that this is the ONLY day program for homeless women & children should make it a priority for the city & county, regardless of which organization hosts it.

    I hope that the two groups are able to overcome the tension and do the right thing for a segment of the homeless population that is particularly vulnerable– and that in the future, the city and county will think about funding more strategically.

  • Susan B.

    It sounds like the first mistake was made when the city and county pledged money to First United, which housed this independent program, rather than to the program itself, which was simply being housed by the church. The church had no incentive or obligation to continue housing the program, beyond compassion and basic moral leadership. The simple fact that this is the ONLY day program for homeless women & children should make it a priority for the city & county, regardless of which organization hosts it.

    I hope that the two groups are able to overcome the tension and do the right thing for a segment of the homeless population that is particularly vulnerable– and that in the future, the city and county will think about funding more strategically.

  • Susan Black

    Susan B and Sarah apparently want folks to be under the mistaken impression that the money pledged to First Church was for Mary’s Place, which it never was. In fact, the money pledged was as part of a compromise designed to preserve the historic sanctuary which First Church owned, in return for First Church establishing a homeless shelter of its own. Mary’s Place certainly has a right to turn down the offer from First Church to become one of its main programs, but they should at least be honest: Mary’s Place made that choice– they were not forced to leave. THEY decided they would rather go close their doors to homeless women and children than partner with another church. Plain and simple.

  • Susan Black

    Susan B and Sarah apparently want folks to be under the mistaken impression that the money pledged to First Church was for Mary’s Place, which it never was. In fact, the money pledged was as part of a compromise designed to preserve the historic sanctuary which First Church owned, in return for First Church establishing a homeless shelter of its own. Mary’s Place certainly has a right to turn down the offer from First Church to become one of its main programs, but they should at least be honest: Mary’s Place made that choice– they were not forced to leave. THEY decided they would rather go close their doors to homeless women and children than partner with another church. Plain and simple.

  • Sarah

    @12: I was not leading anyone to have such an impression, but I’m afraid that you have attempted to do so. Are you a part of Mary’s Place and thus able to speak to the reasons for their decision? As far as “partnering with” another church, becoming a program of a church and thus subject to its rules and ideas is not being a partner. Whether or not Mary’s Place should have taken the offer doesn’t change the fact that it was not an offer of partnership.

  • Sarah

    @12: I was not leading anyone to have such an impression, but I’m afraid that you have attempted to do so. Are you a part of Mary’s Place and thus able to speak to the reasons for their decision? As far as “partnering with” another church, becoming a program of a church and thus subject to its rules and ideas is not being a partner. Whether or not Mary’s Place should have taken the offer doesn’t change the fact that it was not an offer of partnership.

  • Lynn

    I believe it is time for all parties to take a deep breath and contemplate the fact that in early 2010, homeless women and children will have no place to go — in the winter. It will no longer matter who intended which funds for what church, or who said what to whom. People will be suffering. Nothing else should matter except preventing this tragedy.

  • Lynn

    I believe it is time for all parties to take a deep breath and contemplate the fact that in early 2010, homeless women and children will have no place to go — in the winter. It will no longer matter who intended which funds for what church, or who said what to whom. People will be suffering. Nothing else should matter except preventing this tragedy.