Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

City's Latest Revenue Shortfall: $72 Million

At a meeting of the city council’s finance committee this morning, city finance director Dwight Dively revised his forecast for the city’s revenue shortfall to $72 million (which city hall sources predicted would be “awful” earlier this month) for the 2009-2010 biennium. The new forecast is down $16 million from the previous budget forecast.

The revenue forecast will be the basis of Mayor Greg Nickels’ next (and possibly last) budget. City hall sources say that if Nickels doesn’t make it through the primary (which now looks likely; new numbers at 4:30 this afternoon), any proposals for new spending (e.g. on cops) will probably go ignored by the city council. A Nickels loss could also embolden the council to push its own proposals—such as a “dedicated fund” for bike and pedestrian projects, which council member Tim Burgess has requested.

That $72 million doesn’t translate directly to $72 million in cuts. The city has $30 million in its “rainy day” fund, intended specifically for situations like the current budget crisis. Some $25 million of that could go toward paying down the deficit. If city unions decide to accept a proposed ten-day furlough, that could save another $8 million or so. (Most non-union employees will be put on furlough automatically, except employees who are necessary to public safety—police dispatchers, for example—and those who make more money than they cost, like parking meter readers.)

Maintaining cuts that were made in the middle of 2009 could save another $10 million. Finally, if the unions agree to a minimal cost-of-living adjustment (union contracts set the minimum annual COLA at 2 percent), that would save another $5 or $6 million, getting the total the city needs to cut down to about $25 million.

Nickels will submit his budget on September 25. In a statement today, he said he would spend down the rainy day fund and vowed not to cut human services or public safety.


  • swatter

    Now this is what I call the real campaign issue.

  • swatter

    Now this is what I call the real campaign issue.

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed Fat-tailed

    If the unions agree to turn back the clock to 1832, it could save even more $. Because why not extract all cost savings from non-management workers?

  • http://twitter.com/fattailed Fat-tailed

    If the unions agree to turn back the clock to 1832, it could save even more $. Because why not extract all cost savings from non-management workers?

  • seabos84

    “A steep drop in tax revenue has increased the city’s operating budget shortfall through 2010 to $72.5 million, the City Council was told Thursday morning. The 2009 tax base has now shrunk to what it was in 1987, officials said.”

    from the P.I.

    let me see, in the last 29 years, we-the-peee-ons have:

    1. allowed those at the top to keep MORE of what they take from all of us,
    2. they take from all of us cuz they’re at the top and they’re first in line!
    3. the reason they want to be on top is so they can be first in line and take the most!
    4. WTF has letting those at the top ACCOMPLISHED?

    a casino economy of fewer family wage jobs,
    a casino economy of wiped out or ripped off pensions and retirements,
    a casino economy of health ‘insurance’ ONLY while you can work to pay insurance,
    a casino economy of pyramid schemes with the bernie’s and goldmans and AIG boys stealing whatever they want,
    a casino economy of mcmansion pyramids in gated ‘communities’

    and we still have 80% of the worlds population living on 10 bucks a day or less, and 1/2 of 6.4 billion living on less than $2.50 a day.

    so — IF we the peee-ons TAKE BACK WHAT WAS TAKEN FROM THE COMMUNITY, then these rich fu**s will move to nigeria? brazil? bananastan?

    GO.

    see how rich you get selling computers, water faucets, shoes, shoe laces, houses, roofs, shingles, doors, tires, gasoline … to people living on 10 bucks a day.

    ONE Condition, traitors – you legally renounce your citizenship at the airport, and I’LL BUY YOU THE 1 WAY TICKET OUT.

    oh yeah – anyone REALLY think housing is going to come back … ha ha ha ha. idiots.

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    “A steep drop in tax revenue has increased the city’s operating budget shortfall through 2010 to $72.5 million, the City Council was told Thursday morning. The 2009 tax base has now shrunk to what it was in 1987, officials said.”

    from the P.I.

    let me see, in the last 29 years, we-the-peee-ons have:

    1. allowed those at the top to keep MORE of what they take from all of us,
    2. they take from all of us cuz they’re at the top and they’re first in line!
    3. the reason they want to be on top is so they can be first in line and take the most!
    4. WTF has letting those at the top ACCOMPLISHED?

    a casino economy of fewer family wage jobs,
    a casino economy of wiped out or ripped off pensions and retirements,
    a casino economy of health ‘insurance’ ONLY while you can work to pay insurance,
    a casino economy of pyramid schemes with the bernie’s and goldmans and AIG boys stealing whatever they want,
    a casino economy of mcmansion pyramids in gated ‘communities’

    and we still have 80% of the worlds population living on 10 bucks a day or less, and 1/2 of 6.4 billion living on less than $2.50 a day.

    so — IF we the peee-ons TAKE BACK WHAT WAS TAKEN FROM THE COMMUNITY, then these rich fu**s will move to nigeria? brazil? bananastan?

    GO.

    see how rich you get selling computers, water faucets, shoes, shoe laces, houses, roofs, shingles, doors, tires, gasoline … to people living on 10 bucks a day.

    ONE Condition, traitors – you legally renounce your citizenship at the airport, and I’LL BUY YOU THE 1 WAY TICKET OUT.

    oh yeah – anyone REALLY think housing is going to come back … ha ha ha ha. idiots.

    rmm.

  • abc

    Great opportunity to get rid of a lot of bad employees, starting at the top.

  • abc

    Great opportunity to get rid of a lot of bad employees, starting at the top.

  • Where’s your tunnel now?

    Are you “tired of talking about the tunnel” and want to “get on with it already.”

    The current City budget needs to plug at $72.5 million hole created by the down economy. How much is the TOTAL BUDGET for the City of …Seattle: $912 million.

    How much are we on the hook for the tunnel to nowhere? $900 million dollars. Yes, you read that right.

    I know it hurts but we need to rethink this. If our tax base has shrunk to 1987 levels why are we spending this money on a tunnel.

  • Where’s your tunnel now?

    Are you “tired of talking about the tunnel” and want to “get on with it already.”

    The current City budget needs to plug at $72.5 million hole created by the down economy. How much is the TOTAL BUDGET for the City of …Seattle: $912 million.

    How much are we on the hook for the tunnel to nowhere? $900 million dollars. Yes, you read that right.

    I know it hurts but we need to rethink this. If our tax base has shrunk to 1987 levels why are we spending this money on a tunnel.

  • Where’s your tunnel now?

    Yes, everything is about the tunnel…

  • Where’s your tunnel now?

    Yes, everything is about the tunnel…

  • Christopher Stefan

    @6
    One problem is no matter what happens with the viaduct most of the $912 million will need to be spent anyway. For example the seawall needs replacement and if the current viaduct is torn down utilities will still need to be relocated. The good news is utility relocation is more or less funded via ratepayers just like it would be for Qwest, Broadstripe, or Comcast.

  • Christopher Stefan

    @6
    One problem is no matter what happens with the viaduct most of the $912 million will need to be spent anyway. For example the seawall needs replacement and if the current viaduct is torn down utilities will still need to be relocated. The good news is utility relocation is more or less funded via ratepayers just like it would be for Qwest, Broadstripe, or Comcast.

  • seabos84

    the curse of growing up with typewriters? – how come I can’t edit on a computer screen!!! ah!

    WHY are governments cutting services,
    CUTTING EMPLOYEES WHO SPEND MONEY IN THE COMMUNITY,
    during the worst recession in 80 years?

    Because our pathetic sack of shit “leaders” are:

    terrified of ronnie raygun’s ghost, AND

    completely incompetent against the lies of those VERY selfish eyeman pricks, (buddy of the rich pigs who’ve fu**ed everything up!) AND

    terrrified of upsetting their upper income paymasters, AND

    NOT going to take back what the rich and powerful have ripped off from the community!

    (pst! I’m not advocating the dreaded ‘class warfare’, I don’t want all the leafy neighborhood dems to get the vapors…! )

    conclusion – let’s all be pathetic pacified seattle-ites ,and be nicey nice happy happy happy as the roof falls down around our heads, cuz figuring out why the roof is falling down, AND actually fixing it is … that is not happy nice!

    rmm.

  • seabos84

    the curse of growing up with typewriters? – how come I can’t edit on a computer screen!!! ah!

    WHY are governments cutting services,
    CUTTING EMPLOYEES WHO SPEND MONEY IN THE COMMUNITY,
    during the worst recession in 80 years?

    Because our pathetic sack of shit “leaders” are:

    terrified of ronnie raygun’s ghost, AND

    completely incompetent against the lies of those VERY selfish eyeman pricks, (buddy of the rich pigs who’ve fu**ed everything up!) AND

    terrrified of upsetting their upper income paymasters, AND

    NOT going to take back what the rich and powerful have ripped off from the community!

    (pst! I’m not advocating the dreaded ‘class warfare’, I don’t want all the leafy neighborhood dems to get the vapors…! )

    conclusion – let’s all be pathetic pacified seattle-ites ,and be nicey nice happy happy happy as the roof falls down around our heads, cuz figuring out why the roof is falling down, AND actually fixing it is … that is not happy nice!

    rmm.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    @5, tunnel, no tunnel, there is and will be $72 million dollar shortfall.

    There is only so far you can carry on with the lie, that money collected from a toll in a tunnel could somehow get collected without a tunnel (and its toll) and spent on More Important Things.

  • http://manywordsforrain.blogspot.com/ Mr. Baker

    @5, tunnel, no tunnel, there is and will be $72 million dollar shortfall.

    There is only so far you can carry on with the lie, that money collected from a toll in a tunnel could somehow get collected without a tunnel (and its toll) and spent on More Important Things.

  • Mikos

    There will have to be lay-offs. Dively’s message also suggested turn-around would be slow so that balancing he budget by spending the rainy day fund all at once would be simply postponing bigger cuts for another year. Like everything else , government will shrink for the time being.

  • Mikos

    There will have to be lay-offs. Dively’s message also suggested turn-around would be slow so that balancing he budget by spending the rainy day fund all at once would be simply postponing bigger cuts for another year. Like everything else , government will shrink for the time being.