Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Extra Fizz: Racial Agenda?

Pramila Jayapal, the founder and executive director of the immigrants’ rights group OneAmerica (formerly Hate Free Zone), is also a blogger at the PI.com.

A PubliCola reader just pointed me to a blog post Jayapal wrote on Tuesday that picked up on the interview we did with mayoral candidate Joe Mallahan. (Mallahan had criticized Mayor Greg Nickels’ efforts to focus on racial issues in the neighborhoods, on the grounds that it took the Department of Neighborhood’s focus away from basic needs and, more important, Mallahan’s campaign says, that the results (of tackling race issues) have been underwhelming.

Jayapal’s blog essay challenges the idea that electing Barack Obama means we now live in  a “post-racial” America. She looks at three recent examples—the “Wise Latina” dustup, the Henry Louis Gates Jr. arrest, and Mallahan’s comments—to argue:

Unfortunately, too many high-profile local and national conversations disregard these facts and attempt to dismiss the need to focus on race as a critical part of the agenda for how to achieve real progress on a whole host of issues.

The facts?

The 2009 National Urban League book, “The State of Black America 2009: Message to the President,” states that “African Americans remain twice as likely as whites to be unemployed, three times more likely to live in poverty and more than six times as likely to be incarcerated.” In education, the results are equally telling. Nearly half of black students and nearly 40 percent of Latino students compared with 11 percent of white students attend high schools in which graduation is not the norm.

Re: Mallahan, Jayapal had this to say:

I must say I was bewildered by Mallahan’s comment. What on Earth is he talking about? When I hear these words, rightly or not, it sounds like code aimed at the same conservative voters who are afraid of immigrants overrunning our town. And it doesn’t seem a coincidence that Mallahan has suddenly seen an uptick of support since that comment from Republicans, older voters and independents, who are generally most prone to wanting to ignore the race conversation.


  • Progressive Prism

    Say what? “…it sounds like code”? Is Jayapal accusing Mallahan of being a Minuteman or something?

  • Progressive Prism

    Say what? “…it sounds like code”? Is Jayapal accusing Mallahan of being a Minuteman or something?

  • clerk

    Wow, it does appear that Mallahan decided to use Publicola to spread a plea to Republican/conservative voters… great move, or greatest move ever?

    Everyone agrees? Case closed then.

    But to be clear, McGinn WASN’T appealing to Republican voters with his BIG TAXES TUNNEL mailing pieces — which will fuel the pro-Tim Eyman sentiment. Even though he fanned those Eyman flames — we should not assume that was McGinn’s intention.

    McGinn just chose to spend his campaign $$ to spread his progressive vision for the city — which was that he opposes taxes.

  • clerk

    Wow, it does appear that Mallahan decided to use Publicola to spread a plea to Republican/conservative voters… great move, or greatest move ever?

    Everyone agrees? Case closed then.

    But to be clear, McGinn WASN’T appealing to Republican voters with his BIG TAXES TUNNEL mailing pieces — which will fuel the pro-Tim Eyman sentiment. Even though he fanned those Eyman flames — we should not assume that was McGinn’s intention.

    McGinn just chose to spend his campaign $$ to spread his progressive vision for the city — which was that he opposes taxes.

  • Micaphone

    Mallahan is guilty of not properly explaining his point to the degree that there are no questions or confusion on what he actually meant.

    What I think (and granted I have no proof that he really thought this, but this is my guess) he meant is he thought Nickels used race as a “smokescreen” to try and cut parts of the NOD when he just wanted to cut it anyway & used that as the excuse, and then didn’t even follow through on the smokescreen.

    I’m not saying I agree with what I think is Mallahan’s point, just thought I’d offer my 2 cents on how I interpreted it.

  • Micaphone

    Mallahan is guilty of not properly explaining his point to the degree that there are no questions or confusion on what he actually meant.

    What I think (and granted I have no proof that he really thought this, but this is my guess) he meant is he thought Nickels used race as a “smokescreen” to try and cut parts of the NOD when he just wanted to cut it anyway & used that as the excuse, and then didn’t even follow through on the smokescreen.

    I’m not saying I agree with what I think is Mallahan’s point, just thought I’d offer my 2 cents on how I interpreted it.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    Clerk @2 is referring to McGinn’s apparent success with conservative voters, which we reported on here:
    http://publicola.net/?p=10999

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    Clerk @2 is referring to McGinn’s apparent success with conservative voters, which we reported on here:
    http://publicola.net/?p=10999

  • Trevor

    I don’t think that little debate on publicola has anything to do with Mallahan’s standing in the polls.

    And, again, it was the Nickels admin. that originally introduced race into how we talk about the Dept. of Neighborhoods by firing Diers but cynically saying it was because Diers had supposedly turned the DON into an instrument of institutionalized racism. That’s what Mallahan, in his very clumsy way, was trying to criticize. I think. I hope…

    That said, Jayapal’s bigger point that we are not post-race is the more important one. For corroboration, see this as another example:

    http://www.alternet.org/workplace/141825

    Lawrence Mishel, president of the Economic Policy Institute, estimates that 40 percent of African Americans will have experienced unemployment or underemployment by 2010, and this will increase child poverty from one-third of African-American children to slightly over half.

  • Trevor

    I don’t think that little debate on publicola has anything to do with Mallahan’s standing in the polls.

    And, again, it was the Nickels admin. that originally introduced race into how we talk about the Dept. of Neighborhoods by firing Diers but cynically saying it was because Diers had supposedly turned the DON into an instrument of institutionalized racism. That’s what Mallahan, in his very clumsy way, was trying to criticize. I think. I hope…

    That said, Jayapal’s bigger point that we are not post-race is the more important one. For corroboration, see this as another example:

    http://www.alternet.org/workplace/141825

    Lawrence Mishel, president of the Economic Policy Institute, estimates that 40 percent of African Americans will have experienced unemployment or underemployment by 2010, and this will increase child poverty from one-third of African-American children to slightly over half.

  • Gidge

    Mallahan’s comment is also code aimed at the vocal activists who claim to be progressive, but really oppose anything that threatens to bring more economic and racial diversity to their neighborhoods. Those activists, who I’ve come to believe are closet racists, threaten any work that non-profits or government are doing on race and social justice. The fact that Mallahan is echoing their talking points raises a big red flag for me.

    Kudos to Publicola and Jayapal for shining a light on Mallahan’s concerning comments.

  • Gidge

    Mallahan’s comment is also code aimed at the vocal activists who claim to be progressive, but really oppose anything that threatens to bring more economic and racial diversity to their neighborhoods. Those activists, who I’ve come to believe are closet racists, threaten any work that non-profits or government are doing on race and social justice. The fact that Mallahan is echoing their talking points raises a big red flag for me.

    Kudos to Publicola and Jayapal for shining a light on Mallahan’s concerning comments.

  • abc

    Opposing wasting money and raising taxes for bad projects is not only a conservative position.

    For example, reducing bus service while expanding passenger ferry service is not a progressive position.

    Building a multi-billion dollar tunnel is not a progressive position. Raising taxes for the sake of raising taxes is not a progressive position.

  • abc

    Opposing wasting money and raising taxes for bad projects is not only a conservative position.

    For example, reducing bus service while expanding passenger ferry service is not a progressive position.

    Building a multi-billion dollar tunnel is not a progressive position. Raising taxes for the sake of raising taxes is not a progressive position.

  • Ian

    Maybe I’m wrong, but this sounds like a bunch of white people blogging about race relations. What does SoulNerd have to say on this topic?

  • Ian

    Maybe I’m wrong, but this sounds like a bunch of white people blogging about race relations. What does SoulNerd have to say on this topic?

  • McGinnFan

    You know, for all the time Publicola spends attacking Mallahan lately, it sure would be nice to see a pro-McGinn article once in a while. It seems like we’ve had three straight days of the Mallahan and Nickels crybaby match. How about a point-by-point analysis of Nickels’ criticisms of McGinn’s anti-tunnel stance? I mean, Erica just summarized the point/counter point but there hasn’t been anything near the breakdown like was done on the head tax issue. Do that on the tunnel! It’s why many of us are in the McGinn camp goddamnit. Enough of Mallahan already!

  • McGinnFan

    You know, for all the time Publicola spends attacking Mallahan lately, it sure would be nice to see a pro-McGinn article once in a while. It seems like we’ve had three straight days of the Mallahan and Nickels crybaby match. How about a point-by-point analysis of Nickels’ criticisms of McGinn’s anti-tunnel stance? I mean, Erica just summarized the point/counter point but there hasn’t been anything near the breakdown like was done on the head tax issue. Do that on the tunnel! It’s why many of us are in the McGinn camp goddamnit. Enough of Mallahan already!

  • clerk

    @7 – you may not have received McGinn’s mail, but he does not link his opposition to the tunnel to increasing transit. One mailer I got doesn’t say the word transit anywhere on it — just large graphs of how everyone but him wants to tax you to death.

    But McGinn DID NOT appeal to anti-tax Seattle voters with his paid mailing plan saying he’d fight the largest tax increase ever. So no worries, McGinn’s in the clear on this respect, Mallahan clearly has a secret plan he’s deployed using the Seattle blogging network.

  • clerk

    @7 – you may not have received McGinn’s mail, but he does not link his opposition to the tunnel to increasing transit. One mailer I got doesn’t say the word transit anywhere on it — just large graphs of how everyone but him wants to tax you to death.

    But McGinn DID NOT appeal to anti-tax Seattle voters with his paid mailing plan saying he’d fight the largest tax increase ever. So no worries, McGinn’s in the clear on this respect, Mallahan clearly has a secret plan he’s deployed using the Seattle blogging network.

  • Micaphone

    @8 I’m African American. I too would love to hear SoulNerd’s thoughts on this subject, but I’d listen to her thoughts on any subject, not just race-related.

  • Micaphone

    @8 I’m African American. I too would love to hear SoulNerd’s thoughts on this subject, but I’d listen to her thoughts on any subject, not just race-related.

  • DannyK

    Those are serious allegations, and I’d like to see if there’s anything more behind them.

    I don’t think it’s prima facie evidence of racism to suggest that resources could be better spent on actual services rather than on offices of race relations. Our African-American superintendent of schools did exactly the same thing, and presumably she was not trying to rally support from racist White people in Seattle.

    Unless there’s more evidence against Joe, I have to conclude that Jayapal is crying wolf here.

  • DannyK

    Those are serious allegations, and I’d like to see if there’s anything more behind them.

    I don’t think it’s prima facie evidence of racism to suggest that resources could be better spent on actual services rather than on offices of race relations. Our African-American superintendent of schools did exactly the same thing, and presumably she was not trying to rally support from racist White people in Seattle.

    Unless there’s more evidence against Joe, I have to conclude that Jayapal is crying wolf here.

  • Kiwi

    @8 So you are saying Pramila Jayapal, the blogger who wrote this article, is white? I am also ‘not white’ but it’s really none of your business who in here is. And really how would you know?

    Are we supposed to talk in jive or through a ‘yo son’ in there to identify ourselves?

  • Kiwi

    @8 So you are saying Pramila Jayapal, the blogger who wrote this article, is white? I am also ‘not white’ but it’s really none of your business who in here is. And really how would you know?

    Are we supposed to talk in jive or through a ‘yo son’ in there to identify ourselves?

  • ivan

    abc @ 7:

    Who the hell are you to define “progressive,” or a “progressive position” for anyone but yourself?

  • ivan

    abc @ 7:

    Who the hell are you to define “progressive,” or a “progressive position” for anyone but yourself?

  • Kiwi

    @12 – except he didn’t put it that way. He said he didn’t see that race relations were a problem and couldn’t understand putting resources towards those issues. He criticized these programs as promoting a ‘racial agenda’. Maybe he had no idea what the programs he was bashing were all about, but that too is a glaring problem for him. Lack of knowledge.

    Campaign language is important and Pramila is right to call him out on this, if only to flush out what he really means, he never bought up the topic again..so how are people supposed to know?

  • Kiwi

    @12 – except he didn’t put it that way. He said he didn’t see that race relations were a problem and couldn’t understand putting resources towards those issues. He criticized these programs as promoting a ‘racial agenda’. Maybe he had no idea what the programs he was bashing were all about, but that too is a glaring problem for him. Lack of knowledge.

    Campaign language is important and Pramila is right to call him out on this, if only to flush out what he really means, he never bought up the topic again..so how are people supposed to know?

  • Ian

    @13 I should have been more clear, by “this” I meant “this comments thread.” I’m guessing Pramila Jayapal is non-white. I was looking for a “as a person of color who is directly effected by this” type of comment, not a racial shitstorm.

  • Ian

    @13 I should have been more clear, by “this” I meant “this comments thread.” I’m guessing Pramila Jayapal is non-white. I was looking for a “as a person of color who is directly effected by this” type of comment, not a racial shitstorm.

  • Micaphone

    @16 Why on earth would you assume any comments thread is all one particular ethnicity?

  • Micaphone

    @16 Why on earth would you assume any comments thread is all one particular ethnicity?

  • christi

    Joe doesn’t think it’s okay to address racial issues in Seattle?

    Race-baiting or not, consider this:

    Seattle Blacks are arrested for obstructing a police officer 8 X more than whites. That’s usually reffered to as “contempt of cop”. P-I revealed 48% of “obstructionists” were black. Seattle has 10% black pop. 46% of those cases dismissed or no charges – couldn’t be corroborated by prosecutors.

    Even worse are the statistics for obstruction with no underlying charge. That means that the person arrested wasn’t actually arrested for anything – no drug charge or actual violation, just obstruction. This usually is taken as harrassment.

    http://www.seattlepi.com/local/353020_obstructmain28.asp

  • christi

    Joe doesn’t think it’s okay to address racial issues in Seattle?

    Race-baiting or not, consider this:

    Seattle Blacks are arrested for obstructing a police officer 8 X more than whites. That’s usually reffered to as “contempt of cop”. P-I revealed 48% of “obstructionists” were black. Seattle has 10% black pop. 46% of those cases dismissed or no charges – couldn’t be corroborated by prosecutors.

    Even worse are the statistics for obstruction with no underlying charge. That means that the person arrested wasn’t actually arrested for anything – no drug charge or actual violation, just obstruction. This usually is taken as harrassment.

    http://www.seattlepi.com/local/353020_obstructmain28.asp

  • Ian

    @17 In turn, you’re assuming that I’m not black and simply aware that SoulNerd can better articulate my perspective. Tsk tsk. Let me direct you back to the second sentence of my post. Should we not be seeking more diverse viewpoints?

  • Ian

    @17 In turn, you’re assuming that I’m not black and simply aware that SoulNerd can better articulate my perspective. Tsk tsk. Let me direct you back to the second sentence of my post. Should we not be seeking more diverse viewpoints?

  • Ian

    @18 It always amazes me that even in a liberal city like Seattle, where the vast majority of the public seems to embrace our differences, that there is still such a racial disparity in the policing.

  • Ian

    @18 It always amazes me that even in a liberal city like Seattle, where the vast majority of the public seems to embrace our differences, that there is still such a racial disparity in the policing.

  • Trevor

    @18: what I find just as dispiriting is that NO candidate in this race is going to do a damn thing about it.

  • Trevor

    @18: what I find just as dispiriting is that NO candidate in this race is going to do a damn thing about it.

  • hram

    Trevor care to back that up?

    You spoke about the Race and Social Justice initiative before.

  • hram

    Trevor care to back that up?

    You spoke about the Race and Social Justice initiative before.

  • Fred

    ” there is still such a racial disparity in the policing.”

    Well the disproportionate number of murders last year in Seattle were black on black killings…..but I agree, the cops should stop investigating these crimes and stop harassing the ‘hood.

  • Fred

    ” there is still such a racial disparity in the policing.”

    Well the disproportionate number of murders last year in Seattle were black on black killings…..but I agree, the cops should stop investigating these crimes and stop harassing the ‘hood.