Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Contribution(s) of the Day: City Employees to Nickels

As Josh reported last month, the city council passed an ordinance barring city officials from soliciting campaign contributions from city employees (a situation that obviously puts employees in an awkward position). At the time, more than 25 percent of Mayor Greg Nickels’ approximately $350,000 in contributions, or about $93,000, had come from city employees.

As of today, the total Nickels has raised from city workers stands at nearly $127,000 —five time the total city employee contributions to all other city races combined, and more than a quarter of the approximately half-million dollars Nickels has raised so far. And Nickels’ reliance on contributions from city workers has been growing—as Nickels challenger Mike McGinn points out , in his first successful campaign, just two percent of Nickels’s contributions came from inside City Hall.

The new law, as it turns out, doesn’t go into effect until July 22. And even then, city ethics and elections director Wayne Barnett says, enforcement will mostly be based on complaints, not proactive measures. “I don’t think we can assume that people aren’t giving voluntarily, without being solicited,” Barnett says.


  • Jandeera

    ECB: I’m hearing that people are really afraid they will lose their jobs if Nickles loses.

    Is it legal to use city databases (payroll, etc) or city equipment, personnel, facilities to solitit employees for support, votes or donations?

    I’m dying to know how all those city employees magically knew to show up at the legislative districts and vote and how they knew to give $$$.

  • Jandeera

    ECB: I’m hearing that people are really afraid they will lose their jobs if Nickles loses.

    Is it legal to use city databases (payroll, etc) or city equipment, personnel, facilities to solitit employees for support, votes or donations?

    I’m dying to know how all those city employees magically knew to show up at the legislative districts and vote and how they knew to give $$$.

  • 5c

    The Nickels team is merciless at squeezing those who are beholden to them – staff, contractors who stand to lose business, etc. That’s how they’ll get “volunteers,” and it’s how they get money.

  • 5c

    The Nickels team is merciless at squeezing those who are beholden to them – staff, contractors who stand to lose business, etc. That’s how they’ll get “volunteers,” and it’s how they get money.

  • It’s Chinatown, Jake

    everyone knows the hardball politics that nickels has been playing for years. and it is not just getting city employees to donate on his behalf–with threats of firings. no, mayoral staff have even called local businesses to threaten firings unless they muzzled their employees.

    enough of fear politics, even at the local level. good for mcginn raising the issue.

  • Mikos

    Certainly the growth in city employee donations suggests Nickels eight years in office. I have no idea how many of those employees serve at the pleasure of the mayor but those folks will likely give to save their jobs, as Jandeera points out. It’s a tough job market out there.

  • Mikos

    Certainly the growth in city employee donations suggests Nickels eight years in office. I have no idea how many of those employees serve at the pleasure of the mayor but those folks will likely give to save their jobs, as Jandeera points out. It’s a tough job market out there.

  • Maria

    @2, 3

    Or they actually support what he, and they are doing…. just a thought! ha ha, i like the mental imagery here.

  • Maria

    @2, 3

    Or they actually support what he, and they are doing…. just a thought! ha ha, i like the mental imagery here.

  • Ryan M

    @5

    That would be remarkable if they were altruistically giving out of support for what Nickels is doing…. only 25 percent of voters support what Nickels is doing.

  • Ryan M

    @5

    That would be remarkable if they were altruistically giving out of support for what Nickels is doing…. only 25 percent of voters support what Nickels is doing.

  • Maria

    @6 Why don’t you ask some and find out?

  • Maria

    @6 Why don’t you ask some and find out?

  • Trevor

    Wow. Wayne Barnett seems to have a very circumspect and passive approach to his job, which is to enforce the law.

    Imagine if cops never investigated wrongdoing, and only waited for 911 calls…

  • Trevor

    Wow. Wayne Barnett seems to have a very circumspect and passive approach to his job, which is to enforce the law.

    Imagine if cops never investigated wrongdoing, and only waited for 911 calls…

  • RonK, Seattle

    Meanwhile, out in the County, 80% of Assessor candidate Rich Medved’s contributions come from his employees and their immediate family members (or in one case, a recent former and prospective employee currently managing his campaign).

  • RonK, Seattle

    Meanwhile, out in the County, 80% of Assessor candidate Rich Medved’s contributions come from his employees and their immediate family members (or in one case, a recent former and prospective employee currently managing his campaign).

  • City Employee

    I work for the City. I am writing this on my personal cell phone at Starbucks on a short break… not my city computer in my city office. Like the vast majority of city employees I do NOT serve at the pleasure of the Mayor. I also do not work in the Mayor’s office, OPM, DOF or otherwise. My job is secure no matter who is elected as the next Mayor. I think it is only the Directors who serve at the pleasure of the mayor although some Directors are both Exec and Council appointees.

    I gave money to the Mayor. (Actually a lot of money for me). I gave money because I like the Mayor and I like working with his administration. I like his polices and that he has the moxie to take on regional and state agencies on behalf of Seattle. And I like the Nickels administration because they are not afraid to taker a stand and get things done even if it means not everyone is happy. Thank god someone in Seattle politics is willing to be the leader.

    I have had MANY colleagues tell me they support the Mayor. There are a lot of reasons they list.

    1. Nickels administration is not afraid of hearing disagreement and letting the political process work it through.

    2. They are managing the City very well.

    3. They are not afraid to have opinions and to give clear direction of their vision.

    4. The administration shows a lot of leadership.

    I could probably list a million more. No one ever coerced me or even asked me (or any of my colleagues) to give money. The people I know who work at the City are quietly supporting the Mayor because they agree with his policies and his leadership.

    Obviously people who work in public service are both interested and also smart enough to figure out how to give money to candidates as well as attend candidate forums.

    I find it insulting that people would think city employees could not have the brains to give money to the people they support. I would take your findings as a sign that people who work for the City are generally satisfied with the current administration. I bet a lot of them will tell you offline the next time you ask the same thing.

  • City Employee

    I work for the City. I am writing this on my personal cell phone at Starbucks on a short break… not my city computer in my city office. Like the vast majority of city employees I do NOT serve at the pleasure of the Mayor. I also do not work in the Mayor’s office, OPM, DOF or otherwise. My job is secure no matter who is elected as the next Mayor. I think it is only the Directors who serve at the pleasure of the mayor although some Directors are both Exec and Council appointees.

    I gave money to the Mayor. (Actually a lot of money for me). I gave money because I like the Mayor and I like working with his administration. I like his polices and that he has the moxie to take on regional and state agencies on behalf of Seattle. And I like the Nickels administration because they are not afraid to taker a stand and get things done even if it means not everyone is happy. Thank god someone in Seattle politics is willing to be the leader.

    I have had MANY colleagues tell me they support the Mayor. There are a lot of reasons they list.

    1. Nickels administration is not afraid of hearing disagreement and letting the political process work it through.

    2. They are managing the City very well.

    3. They are not afraid to have opinions and to give clear direction of their vision.

    4. The administration shows a lot of leadership.

    I could probably list a million more. No one ever coerced me or even asked me (or any of my colleagues) to give money. The people I know who work at the City are quietly supporting the Mayor because they agree with his policies and his leadership.

    Obviously people who work in public service are both interested and also smart enough to figure out how to give money to candidates as well as attend candidate forums.

    I find it insulting that people would think city employees could not have the brains to give money to the people they support. I would take your findings as a sign that people who work for the City are generally satisfied with the current administration. I bet a lot of them will tell you offline the next time you ask the same thing.

  • 36th district democrat

    Actually we think you have the brins to know what side your bread is buttered on, you have the brains to give money legally, and you have the brains to make it sound like you’re 100% altruistic in fact.
    Others who have the same brains:
    Paul Allen Vulcan engineering companies lawyers developers county employees ST employees and so on.
    The whole money crowd in general has lots and lots of brains. And we know the mayor has the brains to know every one of his thousands of donors by name, to be very, very careful he would never break any laws by granting and provable special favors or provable qui pro quo. Too many brains for that!

    One hand washes the other, you know. It doesn’t take too many brains to figure that out.

  • 36th district democrat

    Actually we think you have the brins to know what side your bread is buttered on, you have the brains to give money legally, and you have the brains to make it sound like you’re 100% altruistic in fact.
    Others who have the same brains:
    Paul Allen Vulcan engineering companies lawyers developers county employees ST employees and so on.
    The whole money crowd in general has lots and lots of brains. And we know the mayor has the brains to know every one of his thousands of donors by name, to be very, very careful he would never break any laws by granting and provable special favors or provable qui pro quo. Too many brains for that!

    One hand washes the other, you know. It doesn’t take too many brains to figure that out.

  • Clyde

    Hey! This is crap to suggest that if you work for the city and give the mayor a campaign contribution it’s only because you are stupid or feel threatened.

    I used to work for the city – I worked closely with Mayor Nickels and I have the greatest respect for him. The fact that people who have actually worked for him and have seen him in action are giving him campaign contributions speaks volumes.

    So how about an expose about how many people who belong to Sierra Club are donating to Mike McGinn – clearly, there must be some sort of quid pro quo or implied threat – don’tchathink?

    (Although I must admit the stupid factor may be real there – I mean, exactly how is Mike McGinn qualified to run one of the biggest organizations in the state?)

  • Clyde

    Hey! This is crap to suggest that if you work for the city and give the mayor a campaign contribution it’s only because you are stupid or feel threatened.

    I used to work for the city – I worked closely with Mayor Nickels and I have the greatest respect for him. The fact that people who have actually worked for him and have seen him in action are giving him campaign contributions speaks volumes.

    So how about an expose about how many people who belong to Sierra Club are donating to Mike McGinn – clearly, there must be some sort of quid pro quo or implied threat – don’tchathink?

    (Although I must admit the stupid factor may be real there – I mean, exactly how is Mike McGinn qualified to run one of the biggest organizations in the state?)

  • Christi S.

    @12 Not to state the obvious, but a) sierra is a volunteer organization and b)McGinn is FORMER leadership.

    I’ve been very impressed with McGinn’s leadership. Keep in mind he does have an impressive record of strategic leadership – diverse and decentralized. Under his leadership, they defeated RTID with a tiny budget – all through good strategy and execution.

  • Christi S.

    @12 Not to state the obvious, but a) sierra is a volunteer organization and b)McGinn is FORMER leadership.

    I’ve been very impressed with McGinn’s leadership. Keep in mind he does have an impressive record of strategic leadership – diverse and decentralized. Under his leadership, they defeated RTID with a tiny budget – all through good strategy and execution.

  • Brian

    @clyde (Although I must admit the stupid factor may be real there – I mean, exactly how is Mike McGinn qualified to run one of the biggest organizations in the state?)

    The snarkiness of the comment aside, I think this gets to something that is too often missed in Seattle or Western Washington politics all together. We all obsess over the minutia of each personal passion and annoyance and try to find the candidate(s) that best match. What we ignore is that a mayor/county executive must also be a good manager. Good managers are tough to find. Do we want to become one of the many municipalities across the country that may have leaders on the right side of the issues, but couldn’t manage a budget or executive department to save their life? All the good values in the world are worthless if you can’t translate them into action, and frankly we spend too much time making sure no one objects (someone is always upset here – I think we may be one of the most egotistical places on the most progressive of issues).

    Maybe a non-Nickels wouldn’t support the tunnel but how would they resolve a budget crisis or prevent one from happening? We should feel relatively good that Seattle isn’t having to feel the squeeze like the state is.

    Obviously its a balance, otherwise we end up with Gregoire who is just an administrator, but management ability is important. Just because someone is a nice guy or has a pure heart doesn’t make them a good public executive. There will be decisions that require confronting their own beliefs and balancing them with the needs of the populous.

    I don’t know yet if Nickels is the best “public executive” out there, but I think we’re focusing too much on whether a candidate will improve individual backyard (or issue) at the expense of a range of others. I just want to see more on their leadership qualities versus their hobbies and special interests.

  • Brian

    @clyde (Although I must admit the stupid factor may be real there – I mean, exactly how is Mike McGinn qualified to run one of the biggest organizations in the state?)

    The snarkiness of the comment aside, I think this gets to something that is too often missed in Seattle or Western Washington politics all together. We all obsess over the minutia of each personal passion and annoyance and try to find the candidate(s) that best match. What we ignore is that a mayor/county executive must also be a good manager. Good managers are tough to find. Do we want to become one of the many municipalities across the country that may have leaders on the right side of the issues, but couldn’t manage a budget or executive department to save their life? All the good values in the world are worthless if you can’t translate them into action, and frankly we spend too much time making sure no one objects (someone is always upset here – I think we may be one of the most egotistical places on the most progressive of issues).

    Maybe a non-Nickels wouldn’t support the tunnel but how would they resolve a budget crisis or prevent one from happening? We should feel relatively good that Seattle isn’t having to feel the squeeze like the state is.

    Obviously its a balance, otherwise we end up with Gregoire who is just an administrator, but management ability is important. Just because someone is a nice guy or has a pure heart doesn’t make them a good public executive. There will be decisions that require confronting their own beliefs and balancing them with the needs of the populous.

    I don’t know yet if Nickels is the best “public executive” out there, but I think we’re focusing too much on whether a candidate will improve individual backyard (or issue) at the expense of a range of others. I just want to see more on their leadership qualities versus their hobbies and special interests.

  • Where is Spock

    @ 36th District Democrat – If you are so down on Paul Allen and Vulcan supporting candidates maybe you should learn more about who funds and controls McGinn’s recent project, Seattle Great Cities.

    I think some key movers and shakers over there momentarily thought about supporting McGinn because they are alinged with him on NOT asking developers to provide public benefits when their property is rezoned (making it much more valuable). But, in the end he is such a terrible ‘candidate’ none of them backed him.

  • Where is Spock

    @ 36th District Democrat – If you are so down on Paul Allen and Vulcan supporting candidates maybe you should learn more about who funds and controls McGinn’s recent project, Seattle Great Cities.

    I think some key movers and shakers over there momentarily thought about supporting McGinn because they are alinged with him on NOT asking developers to provide public benefits when their property is rezoned (making it much more valuable). But, in the end he is such a terrible ‘candidate’ none of them backed him.

  • It's Chinatown, Jake

    everyone knows the hardball politics that nickels has been playing for years. and it is not just getting city employees to donate on his behalf–with threats of firings. no, mayoral staff have even called local businesses to threaten firings unless they muzzled their employees.

    enough of fear politics, even at the local level. good for mcginn raising the issue.