Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

70 Percent Undecided In City Attorney's Race

According to a just-released poll by True Blue Innovation—the same company that found that Mayor Greg Nickels had the firm support of just 18 percent of voters—more than two-thirds of voters, 69 percent, are still undecided in the city attorney’s race, although incumbent Tom Carr has a lead of among those who’ve made up their minds, with 23 percent to challenger Pete Holmes’s 8 percent. More women than men are undecided, and more Republicans than Democrats or Independents, and older voters skew handily for Carr. Complete numbers are available here.


  • Mikos

    Not a big surprise since it’s not on the ballot until November 3rd.

  • Mikos

    Not a big surprise since it’s not on the ballot until November 3rd.

  • Trevor

    Endorsements will matter a lot. Like judges’ races.

  • Trevor

    Endorsements will matter a lot. Like judges’ races.

  • Giffy

    Why ask about the Primary when there are only two candidates and it is essentially a meaningless vote. And especially why do a likely voter model based on primary voters, when again the primary is meaningless.

    True Blue has had some rather questionable polling.

  • Giffy

    Why ask about the Primary when there are only two candidates and it is essentially a meaningless vote. And especially why do a likely voter model based on primary voters, when again the primary is meaningless.

    True Blue has had some rather questionable polling.

  • Jeff

    From the poll: “Where necessary, responses were weighted according to gender, age, party affiliation, ethnic origin or geographical area to reflect the actual demographic proportions likely to turnout in the 2009 Primary Election.”

    Uh…did no one tell them that the City Attorney’s race isn’t on the primary ballot?? Who cares what likely primary voters think of this race.

    I wonder who’s error it was: True Blue Innovation or WinPower Strategies?

  • Jeff

    From the poll: “Where necessary, responses were weighted according to gender, age, party affiliation, ethnic origin or geographical area to reflect the actual demographic proportions likely to turnout in the 2009 Primary Election.”

    Uh…did no one tell them that the City Attorney’s race isn’t on the primary ballot?? Who cares what likely primary voters think of this race.

    I wonder who’s error it was: True Blue Innovation or WinPower Strategies?

  • Giffy

    @4 I got a response from True Blue to a comment (that was then deleted) on their website that basically this poll was an extension of the mayoral one they did last week.

    That poll was not bad regarding the whole field question, though the head to heads were less than ideal.

  • Giffy

    @4 I got a response from True Blue to a comment (that was then deleted) on their website that basically this poll was an extension of the mayoral one they did last week.

    That poll was not bad regarding the whole field question, though the head to heads were less than ideal.

  • Jeff

    @5 Interesting…. yeah, if the head-to-heads were still the primary electorate, it doesn’t say much about the prospects in November.

  • Jeff

    @5 Interesting…. yeah, if the head-to-heads were still the primary electorate, it doesn’t say much about the prospects in November.