Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Neither Business Nor the Economy Is Driven by Rationality

fizz30

Letters, Part 1 : As we reported Wednesday , more than a dozen prominent bike and pedestrian advocates signed on to a letter to the mayor and city council opposing the proposed repeal of the so-called "head tax"—a $25-per-employee tax that exempts employees who don’t drive to work alone.

Yesterday, council member Richard Conlin, who’s running for reelection, defended his support for repealing the tax. His argument: Yes, the tax brings in money for bike and pedestrian projects (among other transportation projects), and no, it’s not very expensive, but it sends a message that Seattle doesn’t like small businesses—and "symbolism counts."

It does bring in some cash, and the amount per employee is pretty symbolic, but neither business nor the economy is driven by rationality, so the amount for businesses is less important than the perception that this is a positive business climate step. We do not believe that there will be any significant change in transportation investments as a result, and I will not personally support any reduction in bike and ped projects as part of any modest reductions that might be proposed (which are likely to be simply stretching out the schedule for some major projects).

As it happens, symbolism counts in economic decision-making — I know we all have this concept of hard-headed business people who only care about the bottom line, but the fact is that perception matters, and "business climate", rational or not, is a consideration for folks.

Letters, Part 2 : North Seattle activist Faye Garneau—head of the Aurora Avenue Merchants Association and a longtime player in city politics—wrote an angry letter to city council member Tim Burgess opposing his proposed nuisance ordinance , which would allow the city to penalize property owners for things like drug dealing and graffiti.

Among her complaints (all descriptions of the legislation are Garneau’s, as Burgess has not yet released a draft): The fact that the ordinance allows the city to implement "abatement proceedings" against a business for activities that "do not even constitute ‘nuisances’ under State Law"; the fact that businesses can be shut down or otherwise penalized without a hearing; and the fact that the ordinance allows the city to fine business owners $500 a day plys $25,000 if the chief of police believes the business owner was not "cooperative."

"People are not liable for damage for the wrongs committed by others, except in rare cases of established agency. This proposed ordinance is an obvious attempt to pin liability on people, NOT FOR THEIR OWN ACTIONS, BUT FOR THE ACTIONS OF OTHERS OCCURRING ON THE OWNER’S PROPERTY, WHETHER THE OWNER PARTICIPATED, WAS AWARE, OR NOT. … PEOPLE ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE PENALIZED FOR THE ACTS OF OTHERS IN OUR COUNTRY."

Book Fizz, courtesy of Book Nerd : This is the last weekend to catch the Jason show at Fantagraphics in Georgetown, including original Jason staples like I Killed Adolf Hitler and The Left Bank Gang . They also have copies on hand of Den Hemmelighetsfulle Mumie (the original Norwegian hardcover edition of Meow, Baby!), as well as his latest book of stories, Low Moon .

Morning Fizz brought to you by Transportation Choices Coalition .

goldenticket-v93


  • http://www.dougsdoodles.com/ DOUG.

    Dear Richard Conlin:

    The “head tax” is indeed symbolic. It symbolizes Seattle’s support for modes of transportation beyond the single-occupancy vehicle. And my vote for David Ginsberg will symbolize my reaction to your support for the tax’s repeal.

    DOUG.

  • http://www.dougsdoodles.com DOUG.

    Dear Richard Conlin:

    The “head tax” is indeed symbolic. It symbolizes Seattle’s support for modes of transportation beyond the single-occupancy vehicle. And my vote for David Ginsberg will symbolize my reaction to your support for the tax’s repeal.

    DOUG.

  • Trevor

    Quote of the day: “symbolism counts.”

  • Trevor

    Quote of the day: “symbolism counts.”

  • Trevor

    Quote of the day: “symbolism counts.”

  • Dittohead…

    Ditto what DOUG said.

    My friends who are business owners and executives are seeing through this as a B.S. move. They are starting to see that sustainable thinking also means showing more integrity in your statements to businesses.

  • Guest

    “Symbolism counts” as well for bike and pedestrian advocates and for proponents of sustainability.

    Conlin led efforts for the bag fee and for changing solid waste contracts, both of which add to consumer costs and which have incentives to follow sustainable practices.

    Council symbolism in positions regarding the “head tax” shows underlying values. Council is showing that individuals should be incented but that business needs a free pass on some issues.

  • Guest

    “Symbolism counts” as well for bike and pedestrian advocates and for proponents of sustainability.

    Conlin led efforts for the bag fee and for changing solid waste contracts, both of which add to consumer costs and which have incentives to follow sustainable practices.

    Council symbolism in positions regarding the “head tax” shows underlying values. Council is showing that individuals should be incented but that business needs a free pass on some issues.

  • It is election year…

    “Symbolism counts” as well for bike and pedestrian advocates and for proponents of sustainability.

    Conlin led efforts for the bag fee and for changing solid waste contracts, both of which add to consumer costs and which have incentives to follow sustainable practices.

    Council symbolism in positions regarding the “head tax” shows underlying values. Council is showing that individuals should be incented but that business needs a free pass on some issues.

  • Trevor

    @4: Not all the Council supports ending the tax. Indeed maybe not even a majority, if they understand the cost of this retreat. Sanity may yet prevail here.

    Also if the bag fee is about punishing consumers, how come the biggest opponent is the chemical industry?

  • Trevor

    @4: Not all the Council supports ending the tax. Indeed maybe not even a majority, if they understand the cost of this retreat. Sanity may yet prevail here.

    Also if the bag fee is about punishing consumers, how come the biggest opponent is the chemical industry?

  • Trevor

    @4: Not all the Council supports ending the tax. Indeed maybe not even a majority, if they understand the cost of this retreat. Sanity may yet prevail here.

    Also if the bag fee is about punishing consumers, how come the biggest opponent is the chemical industry?

  • Elliott

    Hey, I’ve got an idea. If symbolism is so important, why not build a symbolic tunnel under downtown. We’d save billions over the real thing!

  • Elliott

    Hey, I’ve got an idea. If symbolism is so important, why not build a symbolic tunnel under downtown. We’d save billions over the real thing!

  • Elliott

    Hey, I’ve got an idea. If symbolism is so important, why not build a symbolic tunnel under downtown. We’d save billions over the real thing!

  • http://www.richardconlin.com/ Sara

    These are interesting comments (especially Doug’s), since David Ginsberg has not only supported the repeal of the head tax, but has also told business people he wants to repeal the square footage tax, which brings in about 5 times as much money and, if repealed, would blow a $20 million hole in the budget which he does not explain how he’d fill. But maybe he doesn’t tell people like ped/bicycle advocates these kinds of policy positions.

    Richard received the sole endorsement of the Cascade Bicycle Club and the Washington Conservation Voters as well as an early endorsement from the Sierra Club. Incidentally, he also received the endorsement of the Chamber’s Alki Foundation. Richard’s wide support belies the supposed dichotomy between the interests of the business and environmental communities and demonstrates that a balanced approach to sustainability works best.

  • http://www.richardconlin.com/ Sara

    These are interesting comments (especially Doug’s), since David Ginsberg has not only supported the repeal of the head tax, but has also told business people he wants to repeal the square footage tax, which brings in about 5 times as much money and, if repealed, would blow a $20 million hole in the budget which he does not explain how he’d fill. But maybe he doesn’t tell people like ped/bicycle advocates these kinds of policy positions.

    Richard received the sole endorsement of the Cascade Bicycle Club and the Washington Conservation Voters as well as an early endorsement from the Sierra Club. Incidentally, he also received the endorsement of the Chamber’s Alki Foundation. Richard’s wide support belies the supposed dichotomy between the interests of the business and environmental communities and demonstrates that a balanced approach to sustainability works best.

  • http://www.richardconlin.com Sara

    These are interesting comments (especially Doug’s), since David Ginsberg has not only supported the repeal of the head tax, but has also told business people he wants to repeal the square footage tax, which brings in about 5 times as much money and, if repealed, would blow a $20 million hole in the budget which he does not explain how he’d fill. But maybe he doesn’t tell people like ped/bicycle advocates these kinds of policy positions.

    Richard received the sole endorsement of the Cascade Bicycle Club and the Washington Conservation Voters as well as an early endorsement from the Sierra Club. Incidentally, he also received the endorsement of the Chamber’s Alki Foundation. Richard’s wide support belies the supposed dichotomy between the interests of the business and environmental communities and demonstrates that a balanced approach to sustainability works best.

  • Mikos

    I don’t know aobut the economy, but Conlin isn’t driven by rationality. As we all know, endorsements are shortcuts for people (most) who don’t have the time to research candidates. They really don’t tell you much about a person. Most environmental groups these days don’t seem too interested in economic justice. That really tempers my thinking about their endorsements.

  • Mikos

    I don’t know aobut the economy, but Conlin isn’t driven by rationality. As we all know, endorsements are shortcuts for people (most) who don’t have the time to research candidates. They really don’t tell you much about a person. Most environmental groups these days don’t seem too interested in economic justice. That really tempers my thinking about their endorsements.

  • Mikos

    I don’t know aobut the economy, but Conlin isn’t driven by rationality. As we all know, endorsements are shortcuts for people (most) who don’t have the time to research candidates. They really don’t tell you much about a person. Most environmental groups these days don’t seem too interested in economic justice. That really tempers my thinking about their endorsements.

  • kurisu

    @1 Ginsberg symbolically lists Warren Aakervik and Suzie Burke – 2 of the most anti-bike people in the city – right at the top of his endorsements. Now I’m confused.

  • kurisu

    @1 Ginsberg symbolically lists Warren Aakervik and Suzie Burke – 2 of the most anti-bike people in the city – right at the top of his endorsements. Now I’m confused.

  • kurisu

    @1 Ginsberg symbolically lists Warren Aakervik and Suzie Burke – 2 of the most anti-bike people in the city – right at the top of his endorsements. Now I’m confused.

  • Guest

    Sara @ 7 – I support Richard and usually agree with him. He usually takes strong positions regarding sustainability and is always open to discuss issues with the community. He is well respected for that.

    I am hoping to see all on Council work to replace any lost bike and ped funding and replace the incentive to use alternative transportation to get to work (v. SOV driving).

    I believe we can get to a place where the Downtown Seattle Association gets credit with their members for being “tough” with Council (which is why this election year pandering is occurring) AND where bike and ped funding (and the associated jobs) is retained.

  • Guest

    Sara @ 7 – I support Richard and usually agree with him. He usually takes strong positions regarding sustainability and is always open to discuss issues with the community. He is well respected for that.

    I am hoping to see all on Council work to replace any lost bike and ped funding and replace the incentive to use alternative transportation to get to work (v. SOV driving).

    I believe we can get to a place where the Downtown Seattle Association gets credit with their members for being “tough” with Council (which is why this election year pandering is occurring) AND where bike and ped funding (and the associated jobs) is retained.

  • It is election year…

    Sara @ 7 – I support Richard and usually agree with him. He usually takes strong positions regarding sustainability and is always open to discuss issues with the community. He is well respected for that.

    I am hoping to see all on Council work to replace any lost bike and ped funding and replace the incentive to use alternative transportation to get to work (v. SOV driving).

    I believe we can get to a place where the Downtown Seattle Association gets credit with their members for being “tough” with Council (which is why this election year pandering is occurring) AND where bike and ped funding (and the associated jobs) is retained.

  • http://deadcatsbounce.blogspot.com/ Gomez

    1. The increase in companies using temp labor will help big business bypass the head count law, not to mention other regulations.

    2. How far along is Burgess’ measure? Is this something that’s seriously one council vote from getting enacted, or is it just on the table for discussion?

  • http://deadcatsbounce.blogspot.com/ Gomez

    1. The increase in companies using temp labor will help big business bypass the head count law, not to mention other regulations.

    2. How far along is Burgess’ measure? Is this something that’s seriously one council vote from getting enacted, or is it just on the table for discussion?

  • http://deadcatsbounce.blogspot.com Gomez

    1. The increase in companies using temp labor will help big business bypass the head count law, not to mention other regulations.

    2. How far along is Burgess’ measure? Is this something that’s seriously one council vote from getting enacted, or is it just on the table for discussion?

  • http://www.richardconlin.com/ Sara

    Mikos @ 8 – Speaking of environmental groups concerned about economic justice, Richard was also endorsed by BJ Cummings, former Director of the Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition, an alliance of community, environmental and small business groups affected by pollution and its cleanup in the Duwamish River. Fighting for economic justice in cleanup plans is one of their main concerns. I would wager that the cynicism displayed by your contention that endorsements are mere “shortcuts” doesn’t hold true for the individuals and organizations granting them.

  • http://www.richardconlin.com/ Sara

    Mikos @ 8 – Speaking of environmental groups concerned about economic justice, Richard was also endorsed by BJ Cummings, former Director of the Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition, an alliance of community, environmental and small business groups affected by pollution and its cleanup in the Duwamish River. Fighting for economic justice in cleanup plans is one of their main concerns. I would wager that the cynicism displayed by your contention that endorsements are mere “shortcuts” doesn’t hold true for the individuals and organizations granting them.

  • http://www.richardconlin.com Sara

    Mikos @ 8 – Speaking of environmental groups concerned about economic justice, Richard was also endorsed by BJ Cummings, former Director of the Duwamish River Cleanup Coalition, an alliance of community, environmental and small business groups affected by pollution and its cleanup in the Duwamish River. Fighting for economic justice in cleanup plans is one of their main concerns. I would wager that the cynicism displayed by your contention that endorsements are mere “shortcuts” doesn’t hold true for the individuals and organizations granting them.

  • http://www.dougsdoodles.com/ DOUG.

    If Sara’s comments regarding David Ginsberg are true, that is unfortunate. And if the “Susie Burke” listed on Ginsberg’s site is THE Suzie Burke, that is even more unfortunate.

    Neither, however, changes the fact that Conlin’s capitulation on the “head tax” is nothing more than political pandering.

  • http://www.dougsdoodles.com/ DOUG.

    If Sara’s comments regarding David Ginsberg are true, that is unfortunate. And if the “Susie Burke” listed on Ginsberg’s site is THE Suzie Burke, that is even more unfortunate.

    Neither, however, changes the fact that Conlin’s capitulation on the “head tax” is nothing more than political pandering.

  • http://www.dougsdoodles.com DOUG.

    If Sara’s comments regarding David Ginsberg are true, that is unfortunate. And if the “Susie Burke” listed on Ginsberg’s site is THE Suzie Burke, that is even more unfortunate.

    Neither, however, changes the fact that Conlin’s capitulation on the “head tax” is nothing more than political pandering.

  • Kevin

    I think the Head Tax is doomed because it doesn’t pass a basic fairness test as a stand alone tax. It singles out businesses for a higher level of responsibility for the City’s pedestrian and bike trail infrastructure in a way that seems difficult to support (especially when a lot of these businesses are already paying higher rents to locate in pedestrian and bike friendly areas of the City). I think a property tax would be a lot fairer – especially since a lot of pedestrian improvements are likely to be in residential areas.

  • Kevin

    I think the Head Tax is doomed because it doesn’t pass a basic fairness test as a stand alone tax. It singles out businesses for a higher level of responsibility for the City’s pedestrian and bike trail infrastructure in a way that seems difficult to support (especially when a lot of these businesses are already paying higher rents to locate in pedestrian and bike friendly areas of the City). I think a property tax would be a lot fairer – especially since a lot of pedestrian improvements are likely to be in residential areas.

  • Kevin

    I think the Head Tax is doomed because it doesn’t pass a basic fairness test as a stand alone tax. It singles out businesses for a higher level of responsibility for the City’s pedestrian and bike trail infrastructure in a way that seems difficult to support (especially when a lot of these businesses are already paying higher rents to locate in pedestrian and bike friendly areas of the City). I think a property tax would be a lot fairer – especially since a lot of pedestrian improvements are likely to be in residential areas.

  • Guest

    Kevin @ 14 – Actually, the Pedestrian Master Plan prioritizes pedestrian improvements in urban centers which have a combination of dense housing and businesses. There was a conscious effort to use funds in the most cost efficient manner possible. Single family residential neighborhoods get about the lowest priority in the Pedestrian Master Plan.

  • Guest

    Kevin @ 14 – Actually, the Pedestrian Master Plan prioritizes pedestrian improvements in urban centers which have a combination of dense housing and businesses. There was a conscious effort to use funds in the most cost efficient manner possible. Single family residential neighborhoods get about the lowest priority in the Pedestrian Master Plan.

  • It is election year…

    Kevin @ 14 – Actually, the Pedestrian Master Plan prioritizes pedestrian improvements in urban centers which have a combination of dense housing and businesses. There was a conscious effort to use funds in the most cost efficient manner possible. Single family residential neighborhoods get about the lowest priority in the Pedestrian Master Plan.

  • Kevin

    @15 – The priority maps I’ve seen in the Pedestrian Master Plan prioritize a range of areas based on criteria that include equity. Many of these priority areas either residential (I didn’t say single family) or directly adjacent to residential (along bus lines, etc.).

  • Kevin

    @15 – The priority maps I’ve seen in the Pedestrian Master Plan prioritize a range of areas based on criteria that include equity. Many of these priority areas either residential (I didn’t say single family) or directly adjacent to residential (along bus lines, etc.).

  • Kevin

    @15 – The priority maps I’ve seen in the Pedestrian Master Plan prioritize a range of areas based on criteria that include equity. Many of these priority areas either residential (I didn’t say single family) or directly adjacent to residential (along bus lines, etc.).

  • http://motleytools.com/blog Douglas Tooley

    Regarding Faye Garneau’s opposition to the very arbitrary legal ‘nuisance’ standard – this is unfortunately all the more typical these days.

    Though some make think it is just an example of due process – it is in fact an example of institutionalized corruption in the legal profession.

  • http://motleytools.com/blog Douglas Tooley

    Regarding Faye Garneau’s opposition to the very arbitrary legal ‘nuisance’ standard – this is unfortunately all the more typical these days.

    Though some make think it is just an example of due process – it is in fact an example of institutionalized corruption in the legal profession.

  • http://motleytools.com/blog Douglas Tooley

    Regarding Faye Garneau’s opposition to the very arbitrary legal ‘nuisance’ standard – this is unfortunately all the more typical these days.

    Though some make think it is just an example of due process – it is in fact an example of institutionalized corruption in the legal profession.

  • Dittohead…

    Ditto what DOUG said.

    My friends who are business owners and executives are seeing through this as a B.S. move. They are starting to see that sustainable thinking also means showing more integrity in your statements to businesses.