Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

In Redmond, It's $90.

The mayoral contenders at last month's debate in Belltown

The mayoral contenders at last month's debate in Belltown

The city’s so-called “head tax,” a $25-per-employee tax that pays for transportation projects (and exempts employees who don’t drive alone to work), has become a major  issue in this year’s city council and mayoral campaigns, with several council and mayoral candidates saying it should be repealed as soon as possible.

However, a survey of city council members reveals that most council members would be willing to wait until the fall budget process to take up the question of repeal.

City Council members Tim Burgess and Richard Conlin, as well as Mayor Greg Nickels, have proposed repealing the tax (which both Nickels and Conlin, who are running for reelection, previously supported). Nickels wants to push through a repeal as early as this month; however, he has not yet identified which projects he would eliminate or exactly how much repealing the tax would cost the city.

Council member Nick Licata has proposed holding off on repeal until the fall— a move that would take away a major campaign issue for Conlin and Nickels. “What’s driving this [push for repeal now] is basically a political agenda,” Licata says. “This should be part of a budget discussion rather than the mayor running in and saying, ‘We have to get rid of this tax right now.’”

Most of Licata’s colleagues—including Jan Drago, a repeal convert (she sponsored the legislation imposing the tax) who’s running against Nickels —seem to agree, at least in theory. “It should be discussed during budget because it’s a large sum of money and deserves to receive the full scrutiny of the budget process,” Drago says. “It would also then be balanced with all the other needs of the city.”

“The rational side of my brain says, let’s do it during the budget cycle,” adds council member Sally Clark.

Tom Rasmussen and Bruce Harrell also say they would be fine with waiting until budget discussions are underway.

Unless something changes dramatically, the potential delay won’t mean a reprieve for the tax: At least five council members (a majority) have said they support repeal, with only Jean Godden and Richard McIver coming out strongly in favor of preserving it.

Side note 1:  Burgess has said the tax is unnecessarily complicated for businesses to pay. However, compared to most taxes the city administers, it’s actually pretty simple: You count the number of employees you have, survey your employees to find out how many bike, ride transit, carpool or walk to work, subtract that number, then multiply the result by $25. (The city’s guide to the tax is here). Small businesses with gross revenues of less than $80,000 a year are exempt from the tax.

Side note 2: Opponents of the “head tax” say it makes Seattle uncompetitive with nearby cities. However, at least two nearby cities impose higher employee hours taxes than Seattle. In Renton, the head tax is $55 per employee. In Redmond, it’s $90.


  • http://www.twitter.com/jjtweets Johnathon Fitzpatrick

    The City Council sets aside two months to devote exclusively to the budget. Why in the world would they drop everything they’re doing to look at the head tax when the only people pushing to get it cut are candidates? Plus, why are they trying to cut taxes (i.e. revenue) during a budget crunch when they ought to be cutting overages instead?

    btw, that pic is a blast from the past. Hard to believe the Labor Temple forum was only a month ago. If you want to see more pics from that meeting I took a bunch. Here’s a slideshow:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/yourpartypics/sets/72157620823945040/show/

  • http://www.twitter.com/jjtweets Johnathon Fitzpatrick

    The City Council sets aside two months to devote exclusively to the budget. Why in the world would they drop everything they’re doing to look at the head tax when the only people pushing to get it cut are candidates? Plus, why are they trying to cut taxes (i.e. revenue) during a budget crunch when they ought to be cutting overages instead?

    btw, that pic is a blast from the past. Hard to believe the Labor Temple forum was only a month ago. If you want to see more pics from that meeting I took a bunch. Here’s a slideshow:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/yourpartypics/sets/72157620823945040/show/

  • http://www.twitter.com/jjtweets Johnathon Fitzpatrick

    The City Council sets aside two months to devote exclusively to the budget. Why in the world would they drop everything they’re doing to look at the head tax when the only people pushing to get it cut are candidates? Plus, why are they trying to cut taxes (i.e. revenue) during a budget crunch when they ought to be cutting overages instead?

    btw, that pic is a blast from the past. Hard to believe the Labor Temple forum was only a month ago. If you want to see more pics from that meeting I took a bunch. Here’s a slideshow:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/yourpartypics/sets/72157620823945040/show/

  • Good Grief

    Does anyone know if the big employers in Renton and Redmond (I am thinking of Boeing, PACCAR, and MSFT, but maybe others?) have cut deals with the cities to get that fee reduced or eliminated?

  • Bob

    Re side note 2. Renton and Redmond impose city head taxes instead of imposing city B&O tax. Seattle is unique in having both a head tax and a city B&O tax.

  • Good Grief

    Does anyone know if the big employers in Renton and Redmond (I am thinking of Boeing, PACCAR, and MSFT, but maybe others?) have cut deals with the cities to get that fee reduced or eliminated?

  • Bob

    Re side note 2. Renton and Redmond impose city head taxes instead of imposing city B&O tax. Seattle is unique in having both a head tax and a city B&O tax.

  • Guest

    Good Grief @ 2 – Not sure about the “head tax”, but they do get significant B&O tax breaks.

    Also it is interesting that monthly parking and employer provided monthly parking (UW, hospitals, Starbucks corporate, Chase, etc) is not subject to the commercial parking tax.

    If we are going to remove the “head tax” (I prefer calling it the Commuter Tax), how about replacing it with a parking tax that applies to monthly parking and to the parking provided by larger employers who provide free or reduced price parking? That would exempt small business from the perceived “burden” of paying a $25 tax and it would still provide an incentive to use alternative transportation.

    Providing parking is expensive. Free or discounted transit passes are much less costly for business. Win win everyone.

  • Guest

    Good Grief @ 2 – Not sure about the “head tax”, but they do get significant B&O tax breaks.

    Also it is interesting that monthly parking and employer provided monthly parking (UW, hospitals, Starbucks corporate, Chase, etc) is not subject to the commercial parking tax.

    If we are going to remove the “head tax” (I prefer calling it the Commuter Tax), how about replacing it with a parking tax that applies to monthly parking and to the parking provided by larger employers who provide free or reduced price parking? That would exempt small business from the perceived “burden” of paying a $25 tax and it would still provide an incentive to use alternative transportation.

    Providing parking is expensive. Free or discounted transit passes are much less costly for business. Win win everyone.

  • It is election year…

    Good Grief @ 2 – Not sure about the “head tax”, but they do get significant B&O tax breaks.

    Also it is interesting that monthly parking and employer provided monthly parking (UW, hospitals, Starbucks corporate, Chase, etc) is not subject to the commercial parking tax.

    If we are going to remove the “head tax” (I prefer calling it the Commuter Tax), how about replacing it with a parking tax that applies to monthly parking and to the parking provided by larger employers who provide free or reduced price parking? That would exempt small business from the perceived “burden” of paying a $25 tax and it would still provide an incentive to use alternative transportation.

    Providing parking is expensive. Free or discounted transit passes are much less costly for business. Win win everyone.

  • Transit Voter

    The now-lamented (in some quarters) head tax is only $25 per YEAR, something barely exceeding one cent per hour worked for a fulltime employee, AND it only applies to employees who commute via single-occupant automobiles.

    In short, it’s a tax that raises a decent amount of revenue while still being almost totally painless. The only ones expressing dislike now are politicians who think they detect a trifling breeze blowing against the tax, and want to be the first to cave on it. I call BS.

  • Transit Voter

    The now-lamented (in some quarters) head tax is only $25 per YEAR, something barely exceeding one cent per hour worked for a fulltime employee, AND it only applies to employees who commute via single-occupant automobiles.

    In short, it’s a tax that raises a decent amount of revenue while still being almost totally painless. The only ones expressing dislike now are politicians who think they detect a trifling breeze blowing against the tax, and want to be the first to cave on it. I call BS.

  • Transit Voter

    The now-lamented (in some quarters) head tax is only $25 per YEAR, something barely exceeding one cent per hour worked for a fulltime employee, AND it only applies to employees who commute via single-occupant automobiles.

    In short, it’s a tax that raises a decent amount of revenue while still being almost totally painless. The only ones expressing dislike now are politicians who think they detect a trifling breeze blowing against the tax, and want to be the first to cave on it. I call BS.

  • Trevor

    Props to Licata for more sensible leadership that people tend to overlook with their stereotypes about him only being on the losing side of 8-1 votes.

  • Trevor

    Props to Licata for more sensible leadership that people tend to overlook with their stereotypes about him only being on the losing side of 8-1 votes.

  • Trevor

    Props to Licata for more sensible leadership that people tend to overlook with their stereotypes about him only being on the losing side of 8-1 votes.

  • TroyJMorris

    I honestly think this whole head-tax is bullshit. Not the fact there is one, but the fact that this has even become a serious issue in the debate for our next Mayor.

    I think Transit Voter says it best. It’s a fine and dandy tax, but is being spun like it’s the “Death Tax!!!!!!” (also, a totally fine tax). Thanks to the candidates for the Red Herring, now can Publicola stop encouraging this and find some real meat (like you did with the Drago Travelopia)?

    Do you think the $90/head in Redmond is why MSFT made the train? That would make sense.

  • TroyJMorris

    I honestly think this whole head-tax is bullshit. Not the fact there is one, but the fact that this has even become a serious issue in the debate for our next Mayor.

    I think Transit Voter says it best. It’s a fine and dandy tax, but is being spun like it’s the “Death Tax!!!!!!” (also, a totally fine tax). Thanks to the candidates for the Red Herring, now can Publicola stop encouraging this and find some real meat (like you did with the Drago Travelopia)?

    Do you think the $90/head in Redmond is why MSFT made the train? That would make sense.

  • TroyJMorris

    I honestly think this whole head-tax is bullshit. Not the fact there is one, but the fact that this has even become a serious issue in the debate for our next Mayor.

    I think Transit Voter says it best. It’s a fine and dandy tax, but is being spun like it’s the “Death Tax!!!!!!” (also, a totally fine tax). Thanks to the candidates for the Red Herring, now can Publicola stop encouraging this and find some real meat (like you did with the Drago Travelopia)?

    Do you think the $90/head in Redmond is why MSFT made the train? That would make sense.