Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Bloom Kicks Off Council Campaign with Push for More Affordable Housing

As we reported last week, David Bloom, former head of the Church Council of  Greater Seattle (read: a tireless advocate for low-income people), formally kicked of his campaign for Seattle City Council on Thursday night. 

bloom

David Bloom, Legit from the Left

We’ve also already noted that Bloom is one of the few standout candidates in this year’s crowded field of City Council hopefuls. And while candidates have come and gone over the years with a similar Dennis Kucinich agenda (I’m thinking specifically of lefty Joe Szwaja), Bloom brings humility, gravitas, and particularly, unprecedented credibility that is rare from the tofu-and-Fugazi left.

The kickoff, at an all-purpose room at the Swedish Cultural Center on Dexter, was packed with kindred spirits—people from Real Change and the Downtown Emergency Services Center and the Seattle Displacement Coalition (Bloom was a co-founder) and lefty City Council Member Nick Licata’s office—who’ve known Bloom for years.  

Bloom was introduced by a set of longtime political allies—former Seattle City Council Member (and homeless advocate) Peter Steinbrueck; the lone Black King County Council Member (and unflappable progressive) Larry Gossett; homeless advocate and rambunctious folk singer Joe Martin; and Seattle City Council Member Nick Licata—whose heartfelt testimonies to Bloom’s history of activism (Gossett talked about getting arrested with Bloom in the 70s when they were both protesting redlining by racist banks) were a refreshing break from the canned speeches you hear at other events.

Bloom himself  joked that he had planned to enjoy his retirement, he’s 67, by traveling and reading and writing that novel, but  he was too “concerned” that “I have seen the great qualities we love about Seattle” (and at that he gestured to the wall of windows looking out on Queen Anne and Capitol Hill and the Olympics) “slipping away.” 

Bloom’s theme is that City leaders have made a series of decisions “that don’t address the needs of working families in Seattle.” He refers to the investments in “big ticket” “sexy”  projects—$200 million for Mercer; $5 billion for the deep bore tunnel; and the “SLUT” (South Lake Union Street Car)—taking priority over basics like sidewalks and housing. 

“That’s a lot of money, but what about the basic needs of the City?” Bloom asks. “People still don’t have sidewalks, and we’re spending $1 billion in South Lake Union for one of the richest men in the world [Paul Allen]. We don’t need to be doing this.”

His platform includes this demand (which Gossett beamed was “revolutionary” and “the most progressive agenda I’ve seen in 35 years”): 

“Build 5,000 additional affordable housing units above and beyond the goals of the housing levy and the homelessness plan, and require that when developers tear down affordable housing in our neighborhoods, they must replace it.”

Bloom says the majority of the   5,000 additional units should be affordable to people making “at most, 60 percent of the median income—and lower [40 percent of median is about $22,000 a year for a single person]” as opposed to the standard 80 percent [about $45,000 a year].

“That’s a lot of percentages,” Bloom jokes, but then adds seriously: “these numbers [of homeless people] are real.” With the housing levy and the homelessness plan, Bloom’s additional 5,000 would bring the region’s affordable housing stock to about 16,000 units. 

After his speech, I asked Bloom how he planned to translate the enthusiasm from his comfy kickoff (it was a crowd of friends and ideolgical allies) to a broader audience. 

“I’ll talk about the issues I’ve been talking about,” Bloom said. “I’ve been talking to a lot of people, and they are disturbed and unhappy with the direction of the City. Everybody needs basic services.” 

I also asked him who he would ally himself with on the Council. (During his speech he talked about “giving Nick [Licata, the lone lefty] some company.”

Bloom said he’s been getting encouraging feedback from newbie Council Member Bruce Harrell who “says he likes what he’s hearing from me.”

Harrell, whose business-y political profile and donors list matches up much better with Bloom’s opponent Sally Bagshaw, tells PubliCola it’s true, he’s glad Bloom is running. “He’s committed to folks that need a voice on the council,” Harrell says. “And I think that kind of voice is necessary now as we deal with growth,” Harrell says. 

However, Harrell won’t go as far as endorsing Bloom saying he’s waiting until after the June 5 filing deadline to see “where all the chips fall.”


  • Zelbinian

    There are a lot of people running for council. I wonder which choice they support for mayor.

  • Zelbinian

    There are a lot of people running for council. I wonder which choice they support for mayor.

  • Hobgoblin

    Yuck. Building 5,000 units of affordable housing over and above what the housing levy and the homeless plan calls for sounds like a big-ticket item to me. That’s the equivalent of quadrupling the housing levy – how would quadruping that levy address the needs of working families in this city again?

    By the way, his line about 80% of median income being the standard for affordable housing in the city is BS. That’s the threshhold for “incentive zoning” which is affordable housing provided by private, for-profit developers in exchange for greater density. More than half of the units proposed to be built by the housing levy will go to households making minimum-wage or less – that’s approx. $17K per year or 30% of median.

    Candidates and organizations fighting for economic justice in Seattle are focusing on the wrong side of Lake Washington. Is Seattle really that far from being the ideal leftist city? Is Bellevue, six miles away, closer to that ideal?

  • Hobgoblin

    Yuck. Building 5,000 units of affordable housing over and above what the housing levy and the homeless plan calls for sounds like a big-ticket item to me. That’s the equivalent of quadrupling the housing levy – how would quadruping that levy address the needs of working families in this city again?

    By the way, his line about 80% of median income being the standard for affordable housing in the city is BS. That’s the threshhold for “incentive zoning” which is affordable housing provided by private, for-profit developers in exchange for greater density. More than half of the units proposed to be built by the housing levy will go to households making minimum-wage or less – that’s approx. $17K per year or 30% of median.

    Candidates and organizations fighting for economic justice in Seattle are focusing on the wrong side of Lake Washington. Is Seattle really that far from being the ideal leftist city? Is Bellevue, six miles away, closer to that ideal?

  • http://www.bloomforcouncil.org David Bloom

    Hobgoblin is right. The biggest need is for 30% of median and below. That’s why a group of us housing advocates have asked the City Council to designate 60% of the levy rental housing production funds (the largest share) to households at 30% of median and below, and fully 90% to households at 50% of median and below, with the majority of the remainder being at no more than 60%. And I’m not the one who said 80% is the standard for affordability. That is where the feds have pegged it, and the City too often tries to focus “low income” housing production at that level, e.g., the incentive zoning ordinance, while the real need is much lower, as Hobgoblin correctly points out.

  • 40-year Seattleite

    The need for workforce housing in Seattle (for people earning $9-15/hr) is so great, the tax burden would be too high to contemplate if we attempt to build very much of it out of public coffers. Best to keep the public $$ for the poor (like the Constitution says…) and look at other ways to restructure our codes to enable the marketplace start building (again…) real workforce housing.

  • 40-year Seattleite

    The need for workforce housing in Seattle (for people earning $9-15/hr) is so great, the tax burden would be too high to contemplate if we attempt to build very much of it out of public coffers. Best to keep the public $$ for the poor (like the Constitution says…) and look at other ways to restructure our codes to enable the marketplace start building (again…) real workforce housing.

  • Hobgoblin

    David – I think you misread me. I didn’t say the biggest need was for 30% and below. I said that there are already a lot of public dollars dedicated and more scheduled to be dedicated to housing for that income range.

    I also wasn’t claiming that you made up the definition that affordability is at 80% or below, nor was I disagreeing with that definition. My beef was that you claim 80% is standard, when in fact you know that this city spends considerable resources developing housing for income levels far, far below 80%. The expiring and the proposed renewal of the housing levy reflect that.

    Clinton’s former Director of HUD has stated that affordable housing policy fails when it focuses too much on the supply of housing for one income level and ignores those immediately above it. Low-income housing works best when the bulk of it (not all) is transitional. Those individuals who are able, cycle up out of it. But when there are not units available for them to cycle up into, those that would otherwise be able to move out can’t – they end up occupying a unit that would be affordable to someone much worse off than they. And that worse-off individual is without a unit and stuck with a shelter bed (if that is even available).

    It is frustrating that those setting and debating (like you and me) housing policy in this city are doing so without any inventory of housing stock. We have no idea how many units are affordable to different income levels in this city. Officials have no idea what the demand is for different housing stock. Shelter data and homeless counts, we have, but once you get above that level, the lack of data is eye-opening. Yet policy continues to be set and hundreds of millions of dollars spent without that data.

  • Hobgoblin

    David – I think you misread me. I didn’t say the biggest need was for 30% and below. I said that there are already a lot of public dollars dedicated and more scheduled to be dedicated to housing for that income range.

    I also wasn’t claiming that you made up the definition that affordability is at 80% or below, nor was I disagreeing with that definition. My beef was that you claim 80% is standard, when in fact you know that this city spends considerable resources developing housing for income levels far, far below 80%. The expiring and the proposed renewal of the housing levy reflect that.

    Clinton’s former Director of HUD has stated that affordable housing policy fails when it focuses too much on the supply of housing for one income level and ignores those immediately above it. Low-income housing works best when the bulk of it (not all) is transitional. Those individuals who are able, cycle up out of it. But when there are not units available for them to cycle up into, those that would otherwise be able to move out can’t – they end up occupying a unit that would be affordable to someone much worse off than they. And that worse-off individual is without a unit and stuck with a shelter bed (if that is even available).

    It is frustrating that those setting and debating (like you and me) housing policy in this city are doing so without any inventory of housing stock. We have no idea how many units are affordable to different income levels in this city. Officials have no idea what the demand is for different housing stock. Shelter data and homeless counts, we have, but once you get above that level, the lack of data is eye-opening. Yet policy continues to be set and hundreds of millions of dollars spent without that data.

  • Mikos

    As Josh says, Bloom is a good man who has worked in the poverty trenches for years. He would bring the kind of experience and return to basics approach we need on the council. Can he be elected when he doesn’t cater to the silk-stocking monied crowd? Who knows. Considering how much the denizens of this city tout their keen and sophisticated intellects it’s always amazing how they fall for slick brochures and slicker slogans.

  • Mikos

    As Josh says, Bloom is a good man who has worked in the poverty trenches for years. He would bring the kind of experience and return to basics approach we need on the council. Can he be elected when he doesn’t cater to the silk-stocking monied crowd? Who knows. Considering how much the denizens of this city tout their keen and sophisticated intellects it’s always amazing how they fall for slick brochures and slicker slogans.

  • When guns are criminalized onl

    Can he be elected when he doesn’t cater to the silk-stocking monied crowd?

    Excellent question. And then there is the problem of media coverage. What can the guy expect from property developer influenced and controlled media in this town? publicola? The Seattle Times? Crosscut?

  • When guns are criminalized only criminals will have guns.

    Can he be elected when he doesn’t cater to the silk-stocking monied crowd?

    Excellent question. And then there is the problem of media coverage. What can the guy expect from property developer influenced and controlled media in this town? publicola? The Seattle Times? Crosscut?

  • Craig

    Exactly how much money will we have left over for basic city services after we build 5,000 affordable housing units?

  • Craig

    Exactly how much money will we have left over for basic city services after we build 5,000 affordable housing units?

  • http://www.bloomforcouncil.org/ David Bloom

    Hobgoblin, thanks for your clarification. We do have unit affordability numbers for Seattle. The recently released King County Housing Benchmarks report says that while there are 40,609 households at or below 40% of median income, there are only 10,366 units that are affordable to them at 30% of income, the accepted measure of affordability. Further, fully 90% of the rental preservation and production portion of the 2002 levy went to provide housing for households at or below 50% of median. So the need is clear, as is the ability to produce housing for very low income households.

    And to Craig, my proposal to shift priorities from South Lake Union and unneeded street cars and a questionable jail is to free up resources for basic services and infrastructure and for housing. Plus, the 5,000 units I am proposing will include more requirements of developers through mechanisms like inclusionary zoning, which many other cities use, but we do not, so it’s not just a matter of direct funding. I am not saying this will be easy or happen in just a few years, but that we need to set different priorities now toward both basic services and more affordable housing, instead of an agenda that is too heavily driven by downtown and big corporate interests.

    And, finally, about my electability. Yes, if folks like you, who seem to care about our city and its future, will get behind me.

  • http://www.bloomforcouncil.org David Bloom

    Hobgoblin, thanks for your clarification. We do have unit affordability numbers for Seattle. The recently released King County Housing Benchmarks report says that while there are 40,609 households at or below 40% of median income, there are only 10,366 units that are affordable to them at 30% of income, the accepted measure of affordability. Further, fully 90% of the rental preservation and production portion of the 2002 levy went to provide housing for households at or below 50% of median. So the need is clear, as is the ability to produce housing for very low income households.

    And to Craig, my proposal to shift priorities from South Lake Union and unneeded street cars and a questionable jail is to free up resources for basic services and infrastructure and for housing. Plus, the 5,000 units I am proposing will include more requirements of developers through mechanisms like inclusionary zoning, which many other cities use, but we do not, so it’s not just a matter of direct funding. I am not saying this will be easy or happen in just a few years, but that we need to set different priorities now toward both basic services and more affordable housing, instead of an agenda that is too heavily driven by downtown and big corporate interests.

    And, finally, about my electability. Yes, if folks like you, who seem to care about our city and its future, will get behind me.

  • http://www.bloomforcouncil.org/ David Bloom

    Hobgoblin is right. The biggest need is for 30% of median and below. That's why a group of us housing advocates have asked the City Council to designate 60% of the levy rental housing production funds (the largest share) to households at 30% of median and below, and fully 90% to households at 50% of median and below, with the majority of the remainder being at no more than 60%. And I'm not the one who said 80% is the standard for affordability. That is where the feds have pegged it, and the City too often tries to focus “low income” housing production at that level, e.g., the incentive zoning ordinance, while the real need is much lower, as Hobgoblin correctly points out.