Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Let the Angry Press Releases Begin, Pt. 4. Or, Finally, Someone Says It.

The latest press release is in re: the state Senate budget proposal. This one is from the Children’s Alliance.

And while, their statement is more measured than the other communiques that have come in this afternoon (they got a lot of what they wanted like a prized children’s health program—thanks in part to the Feds—and a school meals program), Children’s Alliance Executive Director Paola Maranan concludes with perhaps the most dramatic statement of the day: A call for a tax on the rich. 

“Moving forward, we call on lawmakers to meet this challenge by looking at all solutions, including creating a tax on high incomes to bring more equity and stability to the state budget in coming years,” Maranan said.“Certainly, this is the biggest economic challenge we’ve faced as a state. At the same time, we believe that with bold action, leadership and pulling together as a community we can solve this crisis without eroding the public systems and structures that make Washington a great place to live and raise a family. But we will only meet this challenge if we look at all options, including raising new revenue, to get us through this recession and lay the foundation for our economic recovery.”

Full press release below the jump.

 

Impact of Senate budget goes beyond dollars and cents

Children’s Alliance calls for a long-term solution to state’s revenue problems

 

            March 30, 2009—The State Senate budget proposal released today protects some key programs for children and families, but in this time of growing need the nearly all-cuts budget does not hold kids harmless.

 

“We appreciate that the Senate budget proposal includes funding for children’s health coverage, home visiting programs and school meals. At the same time we must recognize that we are underfunding some of the very programs that will help children and families survive this devastating economic period,” said Paola Maranan, Executive Director of the Children’s Alliance.

 

 

            The Children’s Alliance appreciates the Senate’s preservation of investments in Apple Health for Kids. We are grateful for the substantial infusion of federal funding from reauthorization of the Children’s Health Insurance Program that made it possible to continue the Apple Health for Kids program at a reduced cost to the state.

            Additionally, we commend the Senate for ensuring that kids in low-income families can get school meals by continuing to waive the co-pay many low-income children used to pay for school breakfast and for lunch in kindergarten through 3rd grade. The Senate budget also continues modest support for summer meal programs that feed hungry kids when school is out.

            At the same time, cuts included in the Senate’s proposed budget must be understood within the context of the severe recession facing families. Over the next year, an estimated 40,000 new kids will drop into poverty, driving up the need for programs that help children and families make it through difficult times.

            We appreciate that the Senate’s proposed budget continues 70 percent of current funding for home visiting programs that are proven to help vulnerable families nurture their children through tough times and reduce child abuse rates. This reduced level of investment, however, may mean that nearly one-third of the families currently getting state-supported home visiting services will no longer be able to get them.

            The Early Childhood Education Assistance Program (ECEAP), the state program for low-income kids that is similar to Head Start, would absorb a 2.1 percent cut in funding. While small in percentage terms, this cut translates into about 165 children losing their places in ECEAP—and the opportunity to be prepared to succeed in school.

            Finally, adolescents in foster care will be harmed by this budget, which eliminates housing and other services for teens transitioning out of care.     

            In the longer term, we recognize that the state’s tax structure is inequitable and unstable. We urge lawmakers and residents of this state to pursue a long-term fix to this problem.

 

“Moving forward, we call on lawmakers to meet this challenge by looking at all solutions, including creating a tax on high incomes to bring more equity and stability to the state budget in coming years,” Maranan said.“Certainly, this is the biggest economic challenge we’ve faced as a state. At the same time, we believe that with bold action, leadership and pulling together as a community we can solve this crisis without eroding the public systems and structures that make Washington a great place to live and raise a family. But we will only meet this challenge if we look at all options, including raising new revenue, to get us through this recession and lay the foundation for our economic recovery.”

   


  • Trevor

    This is indeed the inadvertent backlash that our pathetic Senate Democrats have produced: their willingness to cut over 10,000 jobs, increase class size, reduce higher education enrollment, and cut basic services for the most vulnerable has actually begun to generate the political will for an income tax. Because the only other option now is to act like Herbert Hoover and cut spending in ways that will make the recession worse and not better. The fight for the soul of the Democratic Party is on. Time to relearn the word “corporate liberal”, so we can develop alternatives.

  • Trevor

    This is indeed the inadvertent backlash that our pathetic Senate Democrats have produced: their willingness to cut over 10,000 jobs, increase class size, reduce higher education enrollment, and cut basic services for the most vulnerable has actually begun to generate the political will for an income tax. Because the only other option now is to act like Herbert Hoover and cut spending in ways that will make the recession worse and not better. The fight for the soul of the Democratic Party is on. Time to relearn the word “corporate liberal”, so we can develop alternatives.

  • Sarah

    No, an income tax isn’t the only other option. The option that’s much more viable for the short term and more profitable for the long term is cutting corporate tax breaks. There’s no logical or moral reason for Microsoft to be taxed as a start-up, nor is there any reason for financial companies or law firms to not have to pay any B&O tax. These tax breaks have stacked up over the years like a pile of post-it notes and it’s time to start stripping them away. That will take a certain cojones on the part of legislators, but no more — probably less– than they’d need to get an income tax passed.

  • Sarah

    No, an income tax isn’t the only other option. The option that’s much more viable for the short term and more profitable for the long term is cutting corporate tax breaks. There’s no logical or moral reason for Microsoft to be taxed as a start-up, nor is there any reason for financial companies or law firms to not have to pay any B&O tax. These tax breaks have stacked up over the years like a pile of post-it notes and it’s time to start stripping them away. That will take a certain cojones on the part of legislators, but no more — probably less– than they’d need to get an income tax passed.

  • Lionel Hutz

    @1 – I’m not so sure it was an “inadvertent” backlash. It all looks pretty damned coordinated to me.

  • Lionel Hutz

    @1 – I’m not so sure it was an “inadvertent” backlash. It all looks pretty damned coordinated to me.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    I agree with Lionel.

  • Trevor

    Josh you’re saying you think that the Democrats’ plan is to make life so miserable for everyone that a groundswell of populist anger will enable them to increase taxes they secretly want? In other words that they put forward budgets so bad that they can then promise the public that they will save us from… themselves?

    That’s pathetic if it’s true. Because it’s even more spineless than acting like corporate liberals. It fundamentally lacks the courage of one’s convictions, defers responsibility (and blame) while showing zero leadership.

  • Trevor

    Josh you’re saying you think that the Democrats’ plan is to make life so miserable for everyone that a groundswell of populist anger will enable them to increase taxes they secretly want? In other words that they put forward budgets so bad that they can then promise the public that they will save us from… themselves?

    That’s pathetic if it’s true. Because it’s even more spineless than acting like corporate liberals. It fundamentally lacks the courage of one’s convictions, defers responsibility (and blame) while showing zero leadership.

  • kt

    It’s the ‘make me do it’ setup. Consider the opposite scenario in this state.

  • kt

    It’s the ‘make me do it’ setup. Consider the opposite scenario in this state.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    Trevor,

    Not exactly. But close. They’re not hoping for the backlash … they’re orchestrating it. They Always planned on sending a measure out for new taxes, and this was step 1 of the political campaign.

    It’s just a theory (but I definitely know that some members were floating this idea earlier in the session.) And yes, I agree w you: It’s a cowardly way to govern if true.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    Trevor,

    Not exactly. But close. They’re not hoping for the backlash … they’re orchestrating it. They Always planned on sending a measure out for new taxes, and this was step 1 of the political campaign.

    It’s just a theory (but I definitely know that some members were floating this idea earlier in the session.) And yes, I agree w you: It’s a cowardly way to govern if true.

  • Trevor

    @6: Consider what if the state Dems, and even Obama, are as centrist as they claim to be. Maybe there is no secret plan to end the war or avert a depression?

    Maybe they choose war and depression, because anything else (rethinking the war on terror, raising taxes on the wealthy, nationalizing failed industries) would require political battles they are so scared to lose that they won’t even try.

  • Trevor

    @6: Consider what if the state Dems, and even Obama, are as centrist as they claim to be. Maybe there is no secret plan to end the war or avert a depression?

    Maybe they choose war and depression, because anything else (rethinking the war on terror, raising taxes on the wealthy, nationalizing failed industries) would require political battles they are so scared to lose that they won’t even try.

  • Particle Man

    I posted this down the ticker a few stories:

    The Senate Budget Today and the House Budget Tuesday are both “no new taxes budgets”. Both do just about everything creative you can do under present law. Sure some tax breaks are eliminated and this may require more than a majority vote in both houses or a vote of the people, State Parks may be funded by a shift to opt in @$5.00 each, on your car registration and a ton of unspent bonded money for capital projects in process, will be stripped away and used to fund operating costs.
    Even with all these elements, the cuts are deep and will be felt by all of us, if a shift to new taxes or a creative debt plan does not take shape over the next two weeks.

    Some will liken these budgets to shock and awe as a means to soften up the electorate for new taxes and suggest the effort is less than sincere. Well, we may not like what we are seeing but these are real budgets and we will end up with much of what is reflected now, if voters do not approve new taxes later this year.

  • Particle Man

    I posted this down the ticker a few stories:

    The Senate Budget Today and the House Budget Tuesday are both “no new taxes budgets”. Both do just about everything creative you can do under present law. Sure some tax breaks are eliminated and this may require more than a majority vote in both houses or a vote of the people, State Parks may be funded by a shift to opt in @$5.00 each, on your car registration and a ton of unspent bonded money for capital projects in process, will be stripped away and used to fund operating costs.
    Even with all these elements, the cuts are deep and will be felt by all of us, if a shift to new taxes or a creative debt plan does not take shape over the next two weeks.

    Some will liken these budgets to shock and awe as a means to soften up the electorate for new taxes and suggest the effort is less than sincere. Well, we may not like what we are seeing but these are real budgets and we will end up with much of what is reflected now, if voters do not approve new taxes later this year.

  • Trevor

    @9: We have to judge people by their actions and not their intentions. Real budgets represent people’s real priorities. The state leg could pass taxes, could close more tax loopholes, could even deficit spend to give us more time to restructure our tax system. They’re not doing it. I could care less about their sincerity, or whether they feel our pain. Throw the bums out.

  • Trevor

    @9: We have to judge people by their actions and not their intentions. Real budgets represent people’s real priorities. The state leg could pass taxes, could close more tax loopholes, could even deficit spend to give us more time to restructure our tax system. They’re not doing it. I could care less about their sincerity, or whether they feel our pain. Throw the bums out.

  • Particle Man

    Painting these no new tax budgets as some sort of scam is inflammatory and suggests that you fail to grasp the gravity of the situation our state is faced with.
    Tim Eyman has set the stage which ties the hands of our elected officials and prevents them from establishing any new taxes without sending those new tax proposals to the voters. In these economic times, it would be fools play to pass a budget that assumed the taxes proposed would be approved by the voters. So, the projected deficit and this fact cause both houses to put together a budget that can stand without any new taxes.
    The deep cuts which would result from these budgets will bring together a mob of folks who favor more taxes over the deep cuts proposed. This fact does not mean that the budgets are a ploy and in the end I expect we will see a tax package go to a public vote. If this measure fails, we will see cuts very much like what these budgets propose, save for a dramatic turn around in the economy.

  • Particle Man

    Painting these no new tax budgets as some sort of scam is inflammatory and suggests that you fail to grasp the gravity of the situation our state is faced with.
    Tim Eyman has set the stage which ties the hands of our elected officials and prevents them from establishing any new taxes without sending those new tax proposals to the voters. In these economic times, it would be fools play to pass a budget that assumed the taxes proposed would be approved by the voters. So, the projected deficit and this fact cause both houses to put together a budget that can stand without any new taxes.
    The deep cuts which would result from these budgets will bring together a mob of folks who favor more taxes over the deep cuts proposed. This fact does not mean that the budgets are a ploy and in the end I expect we will see a tax package go to a public vote. If this measure fails, we will see cuts very much like what these budgets propose, save for a dramatic turn around in the economy.

  • kt

    Yeah. As I said, consider the nature of this state and the attitudes about income taxes even on the part of people that ought to know better.

    Say the Senate ‘manned up’ as many of you think they should and said they are proposing a state income tax, assuming there would be support for such a proposal among enough legislators.

    The chorus of “no income tax” would be deafening.

    Now you all know what the mission is, right? Get all your friends around the state to create a groundswell for the only sensible solution.

    Or we can suffer like a bunch of victims and blame the spineless legislators.

  • kt

    Yeah. As I said, consider the nature of this state and the attitudes about income taxes even on the part of people that ought to know better.

    Say the Senate ‘manned up’ as many of you think they should and said they are proposing a state income tax, assuming there would be support for such a proposal among enough legislators.

    The chorus of “no income tax” would be deafening.

    Now you all know what the mission is, right? Get all your friends around the state to create a groundswell for the only sensible solution.

    Or we can suffer like a bunch of victims and blame the spineless legislators.

  • Lionel Hutz

    @11 – Relax, Particle Man. No one said it was a scam. I said it was orchestrated – which is something smart people to do make good politics out of a bad situation. It creates momentum for a public vote, which is the legislature’s and the NPO’s end goal. Coordination doesn’t equal deception or falsehoods. Being able to see the play that is being run doesn’t necessarily diminish the need. It just is what it is.

  • Particle Man

    Trevor, a reality check is in order. Or perhaps you just need time to work through the grieving process.
    The phases of denial, anger will not get us where we need to go.

    1.”The state leg could pass taxes” No they cannot.

    2. “could close more tax loopholes” No where near enough for a significant change in the cuts proposed.

    3. “could even deficit spend to give us more time to restructure our tax system.” This would only buy 12 months and then we would be in over our heads.

    Everyone I have talked to expects a tax package to go to the voters, as would be required by law. The content of just what this would and would not restore is where you will see the intentions of legislators show through. All we are seeing now are the results of choices made when no good choices exist.

  • Lionel Hutz

    @11 – Relax, Particle Man. No one said it was a scam. I said it was orchestrated – which is something smart people to do make good politics out of a bad situation. It creates momentum for a public vote, which is the legislature’s and the NPO’s end goal. Coordination doesn’t equal deception or falsehoods. Being able to see the play that is being run doesn’t necessarily diminish the need. It just is what it is.

  • Particle Man

    Trevor, a reality check is in order. Or perhaps you just need time to work through the grieving process.
    The phases of denial, anger will not get us where we need to go.

    1.”The state leg could pass taxes” No they cannot.

    2. “could close more tax loopholes” No where near enough for a significant change in the cuts proposed.

    3. “could even deficit spend to give us more time to restructure our tax system.” This would only buy 12 months and then we would be in over our heads.

    Everyone I have talked to expects a tax package to go to the voters, as would be required by law. The content of just what this would and would not restore is where you will see the intentions of legislators show through. All we are seeing now are the results of choices made when no good choices exist.

  • Particle Man

    Lionel, fair enough. I would still hold that both houses had to put forward budgets that did not assume any new taxes that they did not feel could gain a super majority in both houses.
    This is a stand alone fact.
    It is also true that both houses expect the debate to shift to just what will be presented to the voters.

  • Particle Man

    Lionel, fair enough. I would still hold that both houses had to put forward budgets that did not assume any new taxes that they did not feel could gain a super majority in both houses.
    This is a stand alone fact.
    It is also true that both houses expect the debate to shift to just what will be presented to the voters.

  • Trevor

    @14: Blaming Tim Eyman is even more cowardly than blaming politicians. I’m not saying politicians should save us, or that there isn’t a price to pay in this state for advocating taxes on the wealthy. I’m saying that Democrats’ actions indicate a complete failure of leadership on issues of taxes and budget priorities.

    Have you ever heard of counter-cyclical economics? It’s fairly mainstream Keynsianism. Right now WA State Democratic politicians are rejecting the legacy of FDR, working at cross purposes with the national stimulus package, and rejecting economic orthodoxy in a crass vote pandering scheme. They’re placing their own interests above the interests of the WA state economy.

    Why are you so incapable of criticizing this shitty Democratic Party leadership? It would be easier to understand your position if you used your real name.

  • Trevor

    @14: Blaming Tim Eyman is even more cowardly than blaming politicians. I’m not saying politicians should save us, or that there isn’t a price to pay in this state for advocating taxes on the wealthy. I’m saying that Democrats’ actions indicate a complete failure of leadership on issues of taxes and budget priorities.

    Have you ever heard of counter-cyclical economics? It’s fairly mainstream Keynsianism. Right now WA State Democratic politicians are rejecting the legacy of FDR, working at cross purposes with the national stimulus package, and rejecting economic orthodoxy in a crass vote pandering scheme. They’re placing their own interests above the interests of the WA state economy.

    Why are you so incapable of criticizing this shitty Democratic Party leadership? It would be easier to understand your position if you used your real name.

  • Particle Man

    Trevor @16…cowardly to state a well known FACT?
    Eat me!
    New taxes must go to the voters. End of story. Not as result of politicians but as a result of a oversite sold by Tim and voted for by a majority of the voting public.
    It is not just to suggest that the politicians who put forward this no new taxes proposed budget lack leadership for proposing budgets that can stand if passed by both houses. This is the scope of their job that we the stupid vovers left them with.
    As for my real name, I have been posting as the Particle since before any daily or weekly papers even had political blogs. Why don’t you post your full name, phone and home address?

  • Particle Man

    Trevor @16…cowardly to state a well known FACT?
    Eat me!
    New taxes must go to the voters. End of story. Not as result of politicians but as a result of a oversite sold by Tim and voted for by a majority of the voting public.
    It is not just to suggest that the politicians who put forward this no new taxes proposed budget lack leadership for proposing budgets that can stand if passed by both houses. This is the scope of their job that we the stupid vovers left them with.
    As for my real name, I have been posting as the Particle since before any daily or weekly papers even had political blogs. Why don’t you post your full name, phone and home address?

  • Trevor

    I’m a graduate student at the UW, where the administration is considering reducing enrollment, increasing undergrad tuition over 12%, and cutting over 500 and possibly many more jobs. The Governor proposed a 13% budget cut to the UW, and the Senate Democrats proposed 20%! Reducing access to higher education at a time when WA state has one of the highest unemployment rates in the country is insane.

    That is why I’m so angry. My last name is Griffey. And I don’t currently work for any politicians– as a consultant, staff, party hack, or non-profit supplicant. That’s why I’m not apologizing for the pathetic Democrats we have in Olympia. But what’s your reason? Who do YOU work for? How will you be affected by the budget cuts?

    If the Democrats can rollback initiatives that mandate reduced class size, why can’t they rollback initiatives that limit taxes? If they pass legislation that puts Tim Eyman’s initiatives into permanent law, why then blame Tim Eyman? No one forced them to do that. And they could undo that law if they want. As Paul Krugman wrote, budget balancing madness has infected the states, so we now have to worry about “50 little Herbert Hoovers”– ie governors across the state, many of them Democrats who should know better.

  • Trevor

    I’m a graduate student at the UW, where the administration is considering reducing enrollment, increasing undergrad tuition over 12%, and cutting over 500 and possibly many more jobs. The Governor proposed a 13% budget cut to the UW, and the Senate Democrats proposed 20%! Reducing access to higher education at a time when WA state has one of the highest unemployment rates in the country is insane.

    That is why I’m so angry. My last name is Griffey. And I don’t currently work for any politicians– as a consultant, staff, party hack, or non-profit supplicant. That’s why I’m not apologizing for the pathetic Democrats we have in Olympia. But what’s your reason? Who do YOU work for? How will you be affected by the budget cuts?

    If the Democrats can rollback initiatives that mandate reduced class size, why can’t they rollback initiatives that limit taxes? If they pass legislation that puts Tim Eyman’s initiatives into permanent law, why then blame Tim Eyman? No one forced them to do that. And they could undo that law if they want. As Paul Krugman wrote, budget balancing madness has infected the states, so we now have to worry about “50 little Herbert Hoovers”– ie governors across the state, many of them Democrats who should know better.

  • Lionel Hutz

    @15 – Well said.

  • Lionel Hutz

    @15 – Well said.

  • Particle Man

    Trevor, I have a son in the state college system studying to be a teacher. I am not employed in state government.
    Like so many who work hard every day in state government, my wife is at risk of loosing her job if we end up with a cuts only budget and voters do not pass some sort of tax plan. We count on two pay checks. If she does lose her job we will be forced to sell our house in a down market and will do so at a substantial loss.

    None of these facts make legislators or the governor bad people. These are good people of both parties who are presented a limited set of bad choices to pick from.

    Go ahead and be mad. There is much to be angry about. The lack of regulation and enforcement and criminal exploitation of average folks livelihoods has caused our economy to crash and so many options have been taken away with it.

    We as a state have chosen to take authority away from our representative form of government. The will of the voter was clear even if the language was flawed and the will of the voters was affirmed by the legislature in passing a corrected bill into law. At any rate, the effect is that the voters get a chance to vote any tax package up or down.

  • Particle Man

    Trevor, I have a son in the state college system studying to be a teacher. I am not employed in state government.
    Like so many who work hard every day in state government, my wife is at risk of loosing her job if we end up with a cuts only budget and voters do not pass some sort of tax plan. We count on two pay checks. If she does lose her job we will be forced to sell our house in a down market and will do so at a substantial loss.

    None of these facts make legislators or the governor bad people. These are good people of both parties who are presented a limited set of bad choices to pick from.

    Go ahead and be mad. There is much to be angry about. The lack of regulation and enforcement and criminal exploitation of average folks livelihoods has caused our economy to crash and so many options have been taken away with it.

    We as a state have chosen to take authority away from our representative form of government. The will of the voter was clear even if the language was flawed and the will of the voters was affirmed by the legislature in passing a corrected bill into law. At any rate, the effect is that the voters get a chance to vote any tax package up or down.

  • Trevor

    I don’t give a shit if the legislators are good or bad people. I honestly don’t care about their personalities or their private lives. I care about their public policies, which are terrible, and their leadership, which is so risk averse that it is throwing us to the wolves while telling us they feel our pain.

    UPDATE: while the governor’s budget requested a 13% cut for higher ed, and the State Senate’s budget requested a 20% cut, the State House is proposing a 27% cut! That’s almost $700 million from a $2.6 million budget. That’s going to wipe out as many as 1500 jobs at the UW’s three campuses just like that. The voters are making them do this? Are you serious?

  • Trevor

    I don’t give a shit if the legislators are good or bad people. I honestly don’t care about their personalities or their private lives. I care about their public policies, which are terrible, and their leadership, which is so risk averse that it is throwing us to the wolves while telling us they feel our pain.

    UPDATE: while the governor’s budget requested a 13% cut for higher ed, and the State Senate’s budget requested a 20% cut, the State House is proposing a 27% cut! That’s almost $700 million from a $2.6 million budget. That’s going to wipe out as many as 1500 jobs at the UW’s three campuses just like that. The voters are making them do this? Are you serious?

  • Trevor

    Quick fact supplement (from a friend) to incorporate federal stimulus money and proposed tuition increases into understanding the cuts to the University of Washington:

    The Senate bill cuts UW’s maintenance budget by 189M, adds back 24M in federal stimulus and allows a 7% tuition increase. We end up with a $100 million cut or 12% of our core budget.

    The House bill cuts 260M in state allocation, adds back 33M in federal stimulus and allows a 10% annual tuition increase. We end up with a $133 million cut or 16% of our core budget.

    The UW predicts over 1000 jobs lost with a 12% budget cut. Its planning department hasn’t even prepared for a 16% cut.

  • Trevor

    Quick fact supplement (from a friend) to incorporate federal stimulus money and proposed tuition increases into understanding the cuts to the University of Washington:

    The Senate bill cuts UW’s maintenance budget by 189M, adds back 24M in federal stimulus and allows a 7% tuition increase. We end up with a $100 million cut or 12% of our core budget.

    The House bill cuts 260M in state allocation, adds back 33M in federal stimulus and allows a 10% annual tuition increase. We end up with a $133 million cut or 16% of our core budget.

    The UW predicts over 1000 jobs lost with a 12% budget cut. Its planning department hasn’t even prepared for a 16% cut.

  • Particle Man

    Reminder: This is but one step along the way.

  • Particle Man

    Reminder: This is but one step along the way.

  • kt

    Take this anger and demand increased taxes. I will demand income taxes.

    http://apps.leg.wa.gov/districtfinder/

    Seriously, if you live outside Seattle or know anyone who lives outside Seattle get them to write their legislators. Washington State is ranking low on almost every measure of human investment compared to most other states BEFORE this financial mess. We are a tax haven for millionares. It MUST change.

  • kt

    Take this anger and demand increased taxes. I will demand income taxes.

    http://apps.leg.wa.gov/districtfinder/

    Seriously, if you live outside Seattle or know anyone who lives outside Seattle get them to write their legislators. Washington State is ranking low on almost every measure of human investment compared to most other states BEFORE this financial mess. We are a tax haven for millionares. It MUST change.

  • kt

    Take this anger and demand increased taxes. I will demand income taxes.

    http://apps.leg.wa.gov/districtfinder/

    Seriously, if you live outside Seattle or know anyone who lives outside Seattle get them to write their legislators. Washington State is ranking low on almost every measure of human investment compared to most other states BEFORE this financial mess. We are a tax haven for millionares. It MUST change.

  • Particle Man

    Any tax increase sent to voters will be a hard sell. Voters must become informed and be given a clear and honest choice.
    I am not sure I would bet on success but I will work for it.

  • Particle Man

    Any tax increase sent to voters will be a hard sell. Voters must become informed and be given a clear and honest choice.
    I am not sure I would bet on success but I will work for it.

  • Particle Man

    Any tax increase sent to voters will be a hard sell. Voters must become informed and be given a clear and honest choice.
    I am not sure I would bet on success but I will work for it.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    I agree with Lionel.