Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Morning Fizz: Caffeinated News & Gossip

fizz27

 

1.  The Democratic leadership—Gov. Gregoire, Sen. Majority Leader Lisa Brown, and Speaker of the House Frank Chopp—issued a joint statement this morning saying they are killing labor’s top bill this session, the worker privacy bill. 

(The bill would have prevented management from holding captive meetings on union issues, political issues, and on religious matters).

While the statement sounded serious—it said they had discovered emails linking passage of the workers rights bill to campaign contributions—they didn’t elaborate. 

And I must add: Campaign contributions from MoneyTree and the BIAW have certainly never given the Democrats pause in the past when they’ve voted to scuttle consumer protections on behalf of big business. 

I have a call into the bill sponsor Rep. Mike Sells (D-38, Everett, Marysville) and an email into the Democratic leadership to get a better understanding of this incriminating email. 

UPDATE: Just got this statement back from Democratic leadership: “Can’t elaborate further on a matter that’s the subject of an investigation by the state patrol.”

I have posted their statement below the jump. And weird, it’s dated “May 20, 2008.” (They did send a correction moments later.)

2. In addition to going against their labor constituency, the Democrats—in the state Senate, anyway—voted against environmental interests last night. They passed a bill to undo I-937, the renewable energy initiative that voters passed in 2006,

The roll call on last night’s state Senate vote is posted below.

The statewide vote in favor of the initiative in 2006 was 52-48. In King County, voters went 60-40 for the initiative.

Yesterday evening, four of Seattle’s six senators—Sens. Ken Jacobsen (D-46, N. Seattle), Joe McDermott (D-34, West Seattle), Ed Murray (D-43, Capitol Hill), and Margarita Prentice (D-11, S. Seattle)—voted to undo the initiative.

The two Seattle senators who voted against the bill were: Sens. Adam Kline (D-37, S. Seattle) and Jeanne Kohl-Welles (D-36, Ballard).

 

 

5840

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – May 20, 2008

Joint statement from Gov. Chris Gregoire, Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown and Speaker of the House Frank Chopp on the Worker Privacy Act

“We are no longer considering action on House Bill 1528 and Senate Bill 5446, also known as the Worker Privacy Act.

“Immediately upon becoming aware of an email linking potential action on the bill to campaign contributions, bringing the bill forward was no longer an option.

“The email raises serious legal and ethical questions.

“The matter has been referred to the Washington State Patrol for investigation.”


  • James

    I am incredibly disappointed that Seattle area Senators voted to gut an initiative that passed at over 60% in their constituencies. Representative democracy my ass.

  • James

    I am incredibly disappointed that Seattle area Senators voted to gut an initiative that passed at over 60% in their constituencies. Representative democracy my ass.

  • James

    I am incredibly disappointed that Seattle area Senators voted to gut an initiative that passed at over 60% in their constituencies. Representative democracy my ass.

  • James

    I am incredibly disappointed that Seattle area Senators voted to gut an initiative that passed at over 60% in their constituencies. Representative democracy my ass.

  • http://unclevinny.wordpress.com/ Uncle Vinny

    I wrote to Senator Murray and asked him for an explanation:

    “I really hope you will write to me and explain the reason you chose to support 5840, which effectively neutered the voter-endorsed I-937. You had very strong coverage from the voters (60-40 statewide, probably much stronger in the 43rd district) to push the state towards green power, and you chose to water it down… why?!

    If this is part of some complex legislative Rubik’s cube maneuver, that would be OK with me, just please reassure me that you intend to go above and beyond I-937. But if you actually think 937 is too radical for the times, then you and I need to sit down and have a chat!”

  • http://unclevinny.wordpress.com/ Uncle Vinny

    I wrote to Senator Murray and asked him for an explanation:

    “I really hope you will write to me and explain the reason you chose to support 5840, which effectively neutered the voter-endorsed I-937. You had very strong coverage from the voters (60-40 statewide, probably much stronger in the 43rd district) to push the state towards green power, and you chose to water it down… why?!

    If this is part of some complex legislative Rubik’s cube maneuver, that would be OK with me, just please reassure me that you intend to go above and beyond I-937. But if you actually think 937 is too radical for the times, then you and I need to sit down and have a chat!”

  • http://unclevinny.wordpress.com/ Uncle Vinny

    I wrote to Senator Murray and asked him for an explanation:

    “I really hope you will write to me and explain the reason you chose to support 5840, which effectively neutered the voter-endorsed I-937. You had very strong coverage from the voters (60-40 statewide, probably much stronger in the 43rd district) to push the state towards green power, and you chose to water it down… why?!

    If this is part of some complex legislative Rubik’s cube maneuver, that would be OK with me, just please reassure me that you intend to go above and beyond I-937. But if you actually think 937 is too radical for the times, then you and I need to sit down and have a chat!”

  • http://unclevinny.wordpress.com Uncle Vinny

    I wrote to Senator Murray and asked him for an explanation:

    “I really hope you will write to me and explain the reason you chose to support 5840, which effectively neutered the voter-endorsed I-937. You had very strong coverage from the voters (60-40 statewide, probably much stronger in the 43rd district) to push the state towards green power, and you chose to water it down… why?!

    If this is part of some complex legislative Rubik’s cube maneuver, that would be OK with me, just please reassure me that you intend to go above and beyond I-937. But if you actually think 937 is too radical for the times, then you and I need to sit down and have a chat!”