Viva La Cola!

Founded in January 2009, PubliCola is a blog about Seattle written by journalists who are dedicated to non-partisan, original daily reporting that prioritizes a balanced approach to news. Started by longtime local editor and award-winning reporter Josh Feit, PubliCola is the first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol.

PubliCola was off and running. In June 2009, PubliCola hired another award-winning journalist, super-sourced Seattle city hall reporter Erica C. Barnett.

People were afraid that blogging would change journalism. Instead, we believe journalism can change blogging. Twenty-first century journalism may look and feel different, and yes Erica isn't afraid to get cranky, but we're committed to making sure online news still delivers independent, reliable, even-keeled coverage. And most of all, we're committed to making sure the coverage sparks honest civic debate.

Bringing you cola for the people, PubliCola is named after Publius Valerius PubliCola, the alias for the authors of the Federalist Papers—the original bloggers.

The first online-only news site in state history to get media credentials to cover the state capitol and Seattle city hall, PubliCola has been called a “must-read” by the Seattle Post Intelligencer and a hot “New Media Mover and Shaker” by Seattle Magazine—which also cited our own Erica C. Barnett as the city's No. 1 news nerd.

Morning Fizz: Caffeinated News & Gossip

fizz26

1. Remember how the environmentalist pushing the transit oriented development bill—the bill that calls for more housing around transit stations—caught hell from housing advocate John Fox because he said the bill didn’t preserve enough low-income housing? Well, now the environmentalists pushing the transit oriented development bill are catching hell from the Mayor’s office because the guidelines for preserving and creating low-income housing—one-for-one replacement of any affordable housing that’s lost plus rules to make  25 percent of the housing affordable—are too strong. With two days to go before cut off, the bill still hasn’t passed, and the city and the enviros are at an impasse.

UPDATE: It looks like the bill is queued up for a floor vote this evening. 

2. Remember yesterday when I criticized the Seattle Times for running an editorial by state Senate Majority Leader Sen. Lisa Brown (D-3, Spokane) that advocated undoing voter-approved I-937 (the renewable energy initiative)? And I wondered if they would ever run a competing editorial from U.S. Rep. Jay Inslee (D-1, WA), a stern supporter of I-937. Sources say the Seattle Times has an editorial from Inslee in hand—had it before they had Sen. Brown’s—and thus far, they’ve chosen not to publish it. (The Seattle Times came out against I-937 in 2006.) 

3. Remember the Rep. Hans Dunshee (D-44, Marysville, Lake Stevens) bill we reported on last month?The bill requires the state’s economic development department, which oversees about $4 billion for local capital projects, to make sure the projects are in synch with the state’s green standards to reduce carbon emissions and lower vehicle miles travelled. It passed the House yesterday largely along party lines (Democrats ‘Yea’, Republicans ‘Nay’) 59-38.

But not until after Republican Rep. Doug Ericksen (R-42, Ferndale, Bellingham) got gaveled down for another one of his wild outbursts. This time he was reprimanded for calling Dunshee’s bill “Socialist!”

4. Remember Rep. Sharon Nelson (D-34, West Seattle) payday lending bill?  It passed the House last night, 84-10.


  • MF

    This is a small point. What appeared under Lisa Brown’s by line in the Times was an opinion piece – an op-ed, in the vernacular – not an editorial. Editorials are written by staff and represent the newspaper’s official position.

  • MF

    This is a small point. What appeared under Lisa Brown’s by line in the Times was an opinion piece – an op-ed, in the vernacular – not an editorial. Editorials are written by staff and represent the newspaper’s official position.

  • MF

    This is a small point. What appeared under Lisa Brown’s by line in the Times was an opinion piece – an op-ed, in the vernacular – not an editorial. Editorials are written by staff and represent the newspaper’s official position.

  • MF

    This is a small point. What appeared under Lisa Brown’s by line in the Times was an opinion piece – an op-ed, in the vernacular – not an editorial. Editorials are written by staff and represent the newspaper’s official position.

  • John

    Why do we care what congressman inslee has to say on this bill? He may be doing more harm by sticking his nose in the Olympia sausage making process from DC.

  • John

    Why do we care what congressman inslee has to say on this bill? He may be doing more harm by sticking his nose in the Olympia sausage making process from DC.

  • John

    Why do we care what congressman inslee has to say on this bill? He may be doing more harm by sticking his nose in the Olympia sausage making process from DC.

  • John

    Why do we care what congressman inslee has to say on this bill? He may be doing more harm by sticking his nose in the Olympia sausage making process from DC.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    John @2.

    Great question.

    Here’s why I’m interested in Rep. Inslee’s opinion; two reasons why, actually.

    1) He was the most prominent elected official to stump for I-937 in 2006. He, in fact, championed it.

    2) And this is the real reason: Inlsee and Brown are headed for a showdown. Both Inslee and Brown are rumored to be lining up to run for governor in 2012. This issue divides them, and may play out in their intra-party fight for the nomination.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    John @2.

    Great question.

    Here’s why I’m interested in Rep. Inslee’s opinion; two reasons why, actually.

    1) He was the most prominent elected official to stump for I-937 in 2006. He, in fact, championed it.

    2) And this is the real reason: Inlsee and Brown are headed for a showdown. Both Inslee and Brown are rumored to be lining up to run for governor in 2012. This issue divides them, and may play out in their intra-party fight for the nomination.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    John @2.

    Great question.

    Here’s why I’m interested in Rep. Inslee’s opinion; two reasons why, actually.

    1) He was the most prominent elected official to stump for I-937 in 2006. He, in fact, championed it.

    2) And this is the real reason: Inlsee and Brown are headed for a showdown. Both Inslee and Brown are rumored to be lining up to run for governor in 2012. This issue divides them, and may play out in their intra-party fight for the nomination.

  • Gabe Global

    http://tvw.org/media/mediaplayer.cfm?evid=2009030077B&TYPE=V&CFID=2818839&CFTOKEN=89160594&bhcp=1 at about 13:15 is the recording of Rep Ericksen’s remarks. “One Socialist Washington” got him gavelled the first time and then he was stopped again for being off topic.

  • Gabe Global

    http://tvw.org/media/mediaplayer.cfm?evid=2009030077B&TYPE=V&CFID=2818839&CFTOKEN=89160594&bhcp=1 at about 13:15 is the recording of Rep Ericksen’s remarks. “One Socialist Washington” got him gavelled the first time and then he was stopped again for being off topic.

  • Gabe Global

    http://tvw.org/media/mediaplayer.cfm?evid=2009030077B&TYPE=V&CFID=2818839&CFTOKEN=89160594&bhcp=1 at about 13:15 is the recording of Rep Ericksen’s remarks. “One Socialist Washington” got him gavelled the first time and then he was stopped again for being off topic.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @4,

    Thanks for the link!

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @4,

    Thanks for the link!

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @4,

    Thanks for the link!

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @4,

    Thanks for the link!

  • http://threetreejournal.blogspot.com/ david

    Does anyone who uses the term even know what ‘socialism’ is any more? All of this present-day, context-free antisocialism out of the republican party, in synergy with the MSM’s ham-fisted handling of the issue, have gone a long way to turning ‘socialism’ into little more than a brand name attributable to anything they don’t like. As a one-time govt/history double major, this bothers me more than I suppose it should. Thanks for giving me a place to rant.

  • http://threetreejournal.blogspot.com/ david

    Does anyone who uses the term even know what ‘socialism’ is any more? All of this present-day, context-free antisocialism out of the republican party, in synergy with the MSM’s ham-fisted handling of the issue, have gone a long way to turning ‘socialism’ into little more than a brand name attributable to anything they don’t like. As a one-time govt/history double major, this bothers me more than I suppose it should. Thanks for giving me a place to rant.

  • http://threetreejournal.blogspot.com/ david

    Does anyone who uses the term even know what ‘socialism’ is any more? All of this present-day, context-free antisocialism out of the republican party, in synergy with the MSM’s ham-fisted handling of the issue, have gone a long way to turning ‘socialism’ into little more than a brand name attributable to anything they don’t like. As a one-time govt/history double major, this bothers me more than I suppose it should. Thanks for giving me a place to rant.

  • http://threetreejournal.blogspot.com david

    Does anyone who uses the term even know what ‘socialism’ is any more? All of this present-day, context-free antisocialism out of the republican party, in synergy with the MSM’s ham-fisted handling of the issue, have gone a long way to turning ‘socialism’ into little more than a brand name attributable to anything they don’t like. As a one-time govt/history double major, this bothers me more than I suppose it should. Thanks for giving me a place to rant.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @6,

    I hear you David. But I don’t think it matters. The Republicans have taken control of the word now.

    However, given that Obama (“Socialist” #1) is so popular, it’s not clear if the name-calling tactic is all that effective.

    The GOP was calling Obama a “Socialist” in the run up to the election. And that didn’t seem to work so well.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @6,

    I hear you David. But I don’t think it matters. The Republicans have taken control of the word now.

    However, given that Obama (“Socialist” #1) is so popular, it’s not clear if the name-calling tactic is all that effective.

    The GOP was calling Obama a “Socialist” in the run up to the election. And that didn’t seem to work so well.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @6,

    I hear you David. But I don’t think it matters. The Republicans have taken control of the word now.

    However, given that Obama (“Socialist” #1) is so popular, it’s not clear if the name-calling tactic is all that effective.

    The GOP was calling Obama a “Socialist” in the run up to the election. And that didn’t seem to work so well.

  • http://publicola.net/ Josh Feit

    @6,

    I hear you David. But I don’t think it matters. The Republicans have taken control of the word now.

    However, given that Obama (“Socialist” #1) is so popular, it’s not clear if the name-calling tactic is all that effective.

    The GOP was calling Obama a “Socialist” in the run up to the election. And that didn’t seem to work so well.